Started By
Message
re: Jalen Mills arrested for 2nd Degree Battery on woman - his lawyer disputes it
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:11 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:11 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
The judge said whatever he said, then coaching staff said 'ok we'll let him back, but only if the team approves it', then that was presented to the team? Is that right?
Yes, it essentially added another hurdle to getting back on the team. If the team said "no" even if the coaches were alright with him coming back, he couldn't come back.
1
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:11 am to WG_Dawg
yes
Miles and staff essentially said "you have our vote (coaches), now let's make sure your teammates want you back"
Miles and staff essentially said "you have our vote (coaches), now let's make sure your teammates want you back"
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 9:12 am
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:11 am to Choctaw
Will the team be allowed input on Mills punishment just like they did with Hill's? It really isn't fair to Mills if he isn't allowed the same process Hill got, especially because this appears to be his first incident with the law while Hill had two
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:12 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Hill's first incident was in HS
and no, I doubt it. You've completely missed the point, again, on that situation.
and no, I doubt it. You've completely missed the point, again, on that situation.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:13 am to cas4t
Looks like he has been suspended indefinitely.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:13 am to Duckie
there ya go
Jamal Adams, come on down
Jamal Adams, come on down
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to Alahunter
Yet another example of why the self-righteous amongst us who make shitty comments about other teams' players always get their comeuppance.
Like clockwork.
Like clockwork.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Will the team be allowed input on Mills punishment just like they did with Hill's? It really isn't fair to Mills if he isn't allowed the same process Hill got, especially because this appears to be his first incident with the law while Hill had two
Jesus Christ...will you please do some research or something before commenting again?
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 9:17 am
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to EKG
what are you referring to?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to Duckie
I guess LSU just got their excuse for when Bro Wallace goes in dry for a third straight year.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to cas4t
Mills is indefinitely suspended as of this morning according to Shea. Looks like Miles is going to let this play out before making a final decision on this. I like the move suspend him and see what happens. Once the dust settles either sit him a few games or kick him off.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:14 am to Duckie
quote:
If the team said "no" even if the coaches were alright with him coming back, he couldn't come back.
So if the players said "we're ok with it", he was allowed to return. If the players said "we don't want him back", he would not have come back.
Sooooooo sounds like his return hinged on a team vote, yes? choctaw said earlier
quote:
its just that the "team vote" shite is stupid because you don't know what you're talking about
Sounds to me that the LSU fans have confirmed that, in fact, his return was predicated on a team vote. So now sure how that's incorrect or stupid.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:15 am to cas4t
quote:
there ya go
Jamal Adams, come on down
And remember that Thompson, Martin and Jefferson played a ton last year.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:15 am to Choctaw
quote:careful the aggies will Ra you.
Jesus Christ...will please do some research or something before commenting again?
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:15 am to Alahunter
sucker punchU
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:16 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Sounds to me that the LSU fans have confirmed that, in fact, his return was predicated on a team vote. So now sure how that's incorrect or stupid.
Miles did ask the team if they wanted him back but that wasn't the final say. Les made the call.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:17 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Sounds to me that the LSU fans have confirmed that, in fact, his return was predicated on a team vote. So now sure how that's incorrect or stupid.
You are absolutely correct.
However, the implication with saying "team vote" is that the coaches just allowed the team to make the first and only determination as to whether he was allowed back. Thus, putting his punishment in the hands of his friends. That is untrue.
However, the coaching staff made that decision.
It's a misleading headline to say that "team vote allows Hill back on team."
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 9:18 am
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:17 am to WG_Dawg
you're trying too hard
did you play competitive sports?
I'll let you in on a secret...Miles knew he'd be voted back. It was just to create some unity and put all the drama to bed and get back to football.
Miles has kicked off numerous players without allowing the team to vote. It came down to the coaches.
Stop reaching so far.
did you play competitive sports?
I'll let you in on a secret...Miles knew he'd be voted back. It was just to create some unity and put all the drama to bed and get back to football.
Miles has kicked off numerous players without allowing the team to vote. It came down to the coaches.
Stop reaching so far.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:17 am to WG_Dawg
Step 1: Coaches said it was ok if Hill returns.
Step 2: They let the team decide if it was ok to let him back in their locker room after letting them down.
So yes, if the team said "No" he wouldn't be allowed back, which would be good because their would be locker room issues if he came back and they all hated him.
Step 2: They let the team decide if it was ok to let him back in their locker room after letting them down.
So yes, if the team said "No" he wouldn't be allowed back, which would be good because their would be locker room issues if he came back and they all hated him.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 9:17 am to LSUdm21
So you're saying the vote was just for show? Why even do it?
Page 6 of 41
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News