Started By
Message
It will be difficult for SEC team...
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:01 am
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:01 am
...to get ranked ahead of USC this year if they come out ranked number one in the preseason poll. Check out this pussy schedule.
2012 USC FOOTBALL SCHEDULE
Sept. 1 -- Hawaii
Sept. 8 -- vs. Syracuse (@ E. Rutherford, N.J.)
Sept. 15 -- at Stanford
Sept. 22 -- California
Oct. 4 (Th.) -- at Utah
Oct. 13 -- at Washington
Oct. 20 -- Colorado
Oct. 27 -- at Arizona
Nov. 3 -- Oregon
Nov. 10 -- Arizona State
Nov. 17 -- at UCLA
Nov. 24 -- Notre Dame
I wish we had that light of a load this year for a shot to repeat.
They have two tough games all year long.
2012 USC FOOTBALL SCHEDULE
Sept. 1 -- Hawaii
Sept. 8 -- vs. Syracuse (@ E. Rutherford, N.J.)
Sept. 15 -- at Stanford
Sept. 22 -- California
Oct. 4 (Th.) -- at Utah
Oct. 13 -- at Washington
Oct. 20 -- Colorado
Oct. 27 -- at Arizona
Nov. 3 -- Oregon
Nov. 10 -- Arizona State
Nov. 17 -- at UCLA
Nov. 24 -- Notre Dame
I wish we had that light of a load this year for a shot to repeat.
They have two tough games all year long.
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 11:02 am
9
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:03 am to BamaScoop
I'm not seeing a loss, 
Especially since they beat Oregon last year I can't see Oregon having a shot this year. It may sound crazy but the Washington game could be a trap game on the road.
Especially since they beat Oregon last year I can't see Oregon having a shot this year. It may sound crazy but the Washington game could be a trap game on the road. 
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:04 am to BamaScoop
quote:
They have two tough games all year long.
I look for Norm Chow to stick it to em in the first game.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:05 am to BamaScoop
Just have to get one SEC team into the BCSNCG, and USC's wussy schedule will be exposed.
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 11:06 am
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:06 am to LOCO5150
that schedule is pathetic
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:08 am to MRazorback
quote:
It may sound crazy but the Washington game could be a trap game on the road.
Keith Price is the real deal. UW really doesn't have the horses but a great QB having a Heisman night can make up the difference.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:08 am to BamaScoop
quote:
Sept. 1 -- Hawaii
Sept. 8 -- vs. Syracuse (@ E. Rutherford, N.J.)
Sept. 15 -- at Stanford
Sept. 22 -- California
Oct. 4 (Th.) -- at Utah loss
Oct. 13 -- at Washington loss
Oct. 20 -- Colorado
Oct. 27 -- at Arizona
Nov. 3 -- Oregon loss
Nov. 10 -- Arizona State
Nov. 17 -- at UCLA
Nov. 24 -- Notre Dame
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:17 am to bona fide
Southern Cal ranked #1 is a absolute joke not to mention their schedule. That's all I have to say on this.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:17 am to bona fide
It would be pretty badass for USC to go to the title game in their first year back in the bowls....only to get arse raped by an SEC team (hopefully LSU) I'd be pretty satisfied. I wonder what horse shite excuse ESPN would make up for that one
I'd be pretty satisfied. I wonder what horse shite excuse ESPN would make up for that onePosted on 4/28/12 at 11:18 am to bona fide
Beating Oregon twice will be difficult but they'll probably be at home both times. Very easy schedule aside from Oregon.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:20 am to Adam4LSU
kiffin really would be insufferable if USC won much less over an SEC team. 
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:26 am to Adam4LSU
quote:
I wonder what horse shite excuse ESPN would make up for that one
They would talk about how they have a depleted roster, and look what they did in their first year back. If they make it to the NC, they could lose every single starter and they would still be ranked number 1 going into the next year.
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 11:27 am
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:28 am to BamaScoop
If USC is ranked #1, that's just the AP and ESPN trolling everyone.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:28 am to reb13
quote:
they could lose every single starter and they would still be ranked number 1 going into the next year.
With Texas ranked #2--it's a hidden clause in ESPN's contract with The Longhorn Network*
*call your cable provider today and ask for LHN (better yet, don't)
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:29 am to reb13
quote:Sadly this is correct.
They would talk about how they have a depleted roster, and look what they did in their first year back. If they make it to the NC, they could lose every single starter and they would still be ranked number 1 going into the next year.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:32 am to cokebottleag
When boy wonder losses less than two games in a dogshit conference I'll start believing he's a fine coach,until then,meh.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:50 am to gatorprincess815
their schedule is probably part of the reason they are ranked #1
Posted on 4/28/12 at 12:23 pm to Quidam65
Assigning a value of 120 to non d-1 teams last year's rankings of this year schedule
Arkansas 576 total 48.0 ranking average
Bama 606 total 50.5 ranking average
USC 657 total 54.75 ranking average
PSU 671 total 55.3 ranking average
Penn State did good dropping top ten Alabama , replacing the spot with 55th ranked UVA
Arkansas 576 total 48.0 ranking average
Bama 606 total 50.5 ranking average
USC 657 total 54.75 ranking average
PSU 671 total 55.3 ranking average
Penn State did good dropping top ten Alabama , replacing the spot with 55th ranked UVA
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 4/28/12 at 12:25 pm to BamaScoop
Yet another reason pre-season polls are horseshite.
There shouldn't be a poll until the 4th or 5th week of the season at the earliest.
There shouldn't be a poll until the 4th or 5th week of the season at the earliest.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:43 pm to BamaScoop
We should be top 10 but I dont think they are going to rank us #1 to start the season.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News