Started By
Message
re: In your most fair assessment, was the OM vs ALA game a fluke?
Posted on 11/8/15 at 2:49 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 11/8/15 at 2:49 pm to imjustafatkid
KInda. They can throw the hell out of the ball and were playing good defense at the time.
0
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:02 pm to Kcoyote
No. Bama threw picks, those are not luck.
OM is good at passing the ball. They do not care about running it. That is Alabama biggest weakness on D. So they were able to attack Bama.
Meanwhile, Bama is built to stop running teams like LSU. And LSU still cannot pass the ball except lucky deep passes. So Bama was able to attack them.
OM is good at passing the ball. They do not care about running it. That is Alabama biggest weakness on D. So they were able to attack Bama.
Meanwhile, Bama is built to stop running teams like LSU. And LSU still cannot pass the ball except lucky deep passes. So Bama was able to attack them.
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:02 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Weakness exploited
Weakness of fumbling two kickoffs?
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:05 pm to BamaELCo
quote:
Weakness of fumbling two kickoffs?
Special teams is not Bama's strong suit.
Dont forget about those three picks
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:09 pm to Kcoyote
yes, it was a huge upset. but its hard to say it was a fluke, what happened to the rebels last night could be considered a fluke. but ole miss built 20 point leads on bama, twice. extending 20 point leads twice is not a fluke.
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:11 pm to REBSontheRISE
quote:
yes, it was a huge upset. but its hard to say it was a fluke, what happened to the rebels last night could be considered a fluke. but ole miss built 20 point leads on bama, twice. extending 20 point leads twice is not a fluke.
Not to disagree with your point, which is valid, but letting the other team come back from those leads and fall barely short at the end is sort of a less-appealing side of that same coin.
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:14 pm to Kcoyote
quote:No. They were beating Bama's arse all night long and if not for a great comeback, the game wouldnt have been close.
Yes or no, was that game a fluke upset.
Lets not start rewriting history to make the loss look like a win
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:22 pm to Kcoyote
Of course it was. If you take out the biased Alabama and Ole Miss fan bases and just listen to what neutral parties around the country say they all mention that Alabama self-destructive beat themselves home is called lucky breaks etc the final score is obviously what matters in the record book however you can't ignore how that final score was arrived at when evaluating the teams
This post was edited on 11/8/15 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:23 pm to Kcoyote
Bama still lost and therefore still ate tomato sauce
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:24 pm to ChexMix
I have no problem with Alabama having a loss on their record. Just wanted people's opinions of Bama now to see how times have changed.
Posted on 11/8/15 at 3:49 pm to Kcoyote
times havent changed. Bama is an odd team this year. Defense is amazing but offense is hit or miss.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News