Started By
Message

re: In this age of professional/college athletes run amuck

Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:12 am to
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22030 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:12 am to
No fingerprints
















YOLO
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:26 am to
I don't know that he has made a turn around in his ethics.

We know he stole a computer and stole someones test.And 99.5 percent of people think Auburn paid him for his services.

So, if most of his ethical problems stemmed from lack of money, and he gets a 20 MILLION contract , maybe he just doesn't need to be unethical anymore ?

I think the time which shows peoples true selves are the hard times , not the easy times.

That doesn't mean they guy hasn't changed , it just means people should wait and see over time how he acts.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51819 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:30 am to
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:31 am to
Amok. The word you're looking for is "amok."
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Amok. The word you're looking for is "amok."
You might want to hit up a dictionary real quick.
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
13410 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:48 am to
he might want a refund for that college education...
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:49 am to
quote:

We know he stole a computer and stole someones test.


Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:49 am to
quote:

If you're going to pay for a guy, you might as well get those qualities too. As opposed to paying for heathens like Albert Means.
this exactly, at least Auburn's investment paid off.
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:49 am to
quote:

You might want to hit up a dictionary real quick.



Okay: Amok via Merriam Webster. Hell, if you look "amuck" in the dictionary it says "variant of amok" and doesn't even offer a definition.

Also, Wikipedia.

The term is to "run amok." "Amuck" is a misspelling that has, unfortunately, entered common usage.

So how about you hit up a dictionary for once, bitch.
This post was edited on 7/31/13 at 10:55 am
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:53 am to
quote:

he most certainly lied his arse off to the media/public about the scandal.


Proof bitch, where is it?
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Okay: Amok via Merriam Webster
And from that link....

quote:

Variants of AMOK
amok also amuck

quote:

Synonyms
amuck
quote:

1. In a frenzy to do violence or kill: rioters running amuck in the streets.
quote:

adv.
3. run or go amuck or amok,
a. to rush about in a murderous frenzy.
b. to go or rush about wildly; be out of control.
There was no need for a correction because the term he used ("amuck") is correct.

quote:

So how about you hit up a dictionary for once, bitch.


What a tool...
This post was edited on 7/31/13 at 10:56 am
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Proof bitch, where is it?


He better have a flow chart to prove it.
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:57 am to
quote:

There was no need for a correction because the term he used ("amuck") is correct.



You can argue that it's technically correct all you want, but the original term is amok and the word amuck is the product of people routinely misspelling it into common usage.

It's like saying that "drive thru" is a variation of "drive through." Technically it is, but that doesn't mean it isn't a misspelling.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112594 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 10:57 am to
pls pc
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 11:00 am to
Posted by InVolNerable
Member since Jan 2012
10203 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 11:03 am to
quote:

the word amuck is the product of people routinely misspelling it into common usage.


If it's in the dictionary, it's correct.

quote:

that doesn't mean it isn't a misspelling.


Actually, that's exactly what it means.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 11:18 am to
quote:

You can argue that it's technically correct all you want, but the original term is amok and the word amuck is the product of people routinely misspelling it into common usage.

It's like saying that "drive thru" is a variation of "drive through." Technically it is, but that doesn't mean it isn't a misspelling.


Oxford Dictionary - Amok can also be spelled amuck; both are correct, although amok is far more common.
Dictionary of phrase and fable. [A dictionary of English literature] - Amuck: to run amuck

quote:

But no sooner did Victor's feet touch the deck than he began to clean up the ship. He had the strength of several men, and he ran amuck with it. I remember especially one man whom he got into the chain-boxes but failed to damage through inability to hit him. The man dodged and ducked, and Victor broke all the knuckles of both his fists against the huge links of the anchor chain.
quote:

A shipmate dropped in, several shipmates dropped in, and we had more quiet drinks. Finally, just as we had engaged a Japanese orchestra, and as the first strains of the samisens and taikos were rising, through the paper-walls came a wild howl from the street. We recognised it. Still howling, disdaining doorways, with blood-shot eyes and wildly waving muscular arms, Victor burst upon us through the fragile walls. The old amuck rage was on him, and he wanted blood, anybody's blood. The orchestra fled; so did we. We went through doorways, and we went through paper-walls--anything to get away.
Jack London, 1913
This post was edited on 7/31/13 at 11:20 am
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51819 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 11:21 am to
Posted by rowdyreptiles
melbourne
Member since May 2013
180 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 11:34 am to
I always liked cam always seemed like a good dude, he had so much passion just look at the way he celebrated after every win, he was good for college football.

If his dad really did ask for money, what do you expect cam to do go on t.v and rat his own dad out?
You would lie for your dad

gumps are just butthurt
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 7/31/13 at 12:26 pm to
ok i stahp pls dont call moffan
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter