Started By
Message
re: In the past 24 hours alone...
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:20 am to ocelot4ark
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:20 am to ocelot4ark
quote:
Any of you who are old enough to actually to have attended an introductory psychology class could easily explain the preponderance of threads started by you guys.
To be fair, anyone old enough to have taken a statistics class could easily explain that the greater sample size of LSU posters may contribute to the greater number of any particular "subject heading" of threads.
Did you normalize your results? Control for that additional sampling set?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:21 am to ocelot4ark
You've been here since October 2009 and haven't noticed the flaming of LSU by Arkansas fans that entire period?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:21 am to Froman
quote:
You need to learn the definition of flame.
Really? Which ones of those threads wasn't a blatant flame attempt?
You guys doth protest too much.
:youscared:
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:25 am to Froman
quote:
You need to learn the definition of flame.
Not all of these are flames. Not by a long shot
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:26 am to spslayto
quote:
You've been here since October 2009 and haven't noticed the flaming of LSU by Arkansas fans that entire period?
This isn't about the past 2 years (Draconian alone has started more flame threads about Arkansas, probably).
This is about you guys shitting all over the board with your rhetoric. You can't go 2 hours without going out of your way to show JUST how superior you are. There have been a handful of legitimate threads started with the intent to actually discuss the game, injuries, etc. But everything else is the same, played out little league bullshite.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:26 am to ocelot4ark
You do realize y'all bring it on yourselves?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:27 am to CollegeFBRules
For one, some of those aren't thread flames. Secondly, they're also not all started in the last 24 hours.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:27 am to ocelot4ark
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:28 am to bidnes
quote:
Not all of these are flames. Not by a long shot
This should be easy enough. Which ones aren't flames?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:28 am to ocelot4ark
quote:
Really? Which ones of those threads wasn't a blatant flame attempt?
You guys doth protest too much.
:youscared:
No one is scared of your hogs brah. This LSU team is so full of "don't give a shite" that they are immune to fear, especially in big games. The real scary thing in all of this is we return most of this team next year and probably get immediately better at QB.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:28 am to ocelot4ark
Dude it's a message board and it's the way most of us pass a little time at the office - its all in good fun. If it burns you up this badly that you would spend your time counting insults, then maybe it's best to step away for the week.
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:28 am to ocelot4ark
quote:
Any of you who are old enough to actually have attended an introductory psychology class could easily explain the preponderance of threads started by you guys.
There's definitely an underlying theme to my thread. But I thought I'd wait for someone else to figure it out.
Good lord. This type of thread is best left ignored, but when you start trying to act intellectually superior, it becomes difficult.
What does 13 in a day mean? Give us some context. What percent of total threads is that? It seems like a thread is started every few minutes. Also, I assume you made sure that the number of Arky flame threads is less. Is not, would your psychoanalysis above be different? What is your diagnosis for someone who was so hurt by flame posts on a message board, that he took time out of his day to find them and link them in a tear filled thread?
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:28 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
and considering this an LSU board, you would expect discrepancies in numbers based on the people registered here.
great minds
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:29 am to ocelot4ark
quote:That's awesome considering the original post.
For one, some of those aren't thread flames
Posted on 11/22/11 at 8:29 am to bidnes
quote:
LINK
Included that because he could have easily put his prediction in the prediction thread. But I'll admit it's borderline at best. So let's make it 12.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News