Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/4/13 at 3:53 pm to CockRocket
quote:
USC is a more complete team than Florida.
No, not now. I don't know why their tard coaches were going with Driskel at quarterback.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 3:55 pm to GumpMaster&Commander
quote:
I don't know why their tard coaches were going with Driskel at quarterback.
This is a great mystery to all of us. Unless Murphy just sucks in practice, I can't figure this out. I'm no expert and I've said all along the game isn't slowing down quickly enough for Driskel despite all his physical gifts. If some dumbass like me screaming at his TV can see that, surely the coaches can.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 10/4/13 at 3:55 pm to GumpMaster&Commander
Uh, yeah we still are. Their defense took a hit with Easley going down and to be honest, they haven't really played any good teams save Miami, who they lost to. It's tough to gauge them right now because of the injuries (Driskell's could be a positive) but right now USC has the better body of work.
Florida Defense
USC offense
USC defense
Florida offense
Florida Defense
USC offense
USC defense
Florida offense
Posted on 10/4/13 at 4:11 pm to BossaGator
quote:
This is a great mystery to all of us. Unless Murphy just sucks in practice, I can't figure this out. I'm no expert and I've said all along the game isn't slowing down quickly enough for Driskel despite all his physical gifts. If some dumbass like me screaming at his TV can see that, surely the coaches can.
Every football fan in the country knew Driskel wasn't hacking it. Murphy looks a lot better.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 4:17 pm to GumpMaster&Commander
quote:
Every football fan in the country knew Driskel wasn't hacking it.
Probably so. I'm not bragging about having some great insight. In fact, quite the opposite. The point of my post is the near inexplicable nature of the coaches' insistence on starting Driskel.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 10/4/13 at 4:52 pm to CockRocket
quote:
USC is a more complete team than Florida.
That 1969 team was, I bet?
44-11 and
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 10/4/13 at 5:02 pm to Edearl Watson
You wanna bring up something from 1969 and last year that has no bearing on this game? arse. 
I promise you we score more than 20 and get the W.
I promise you we score more than 20 and get the W. 
Posted on 10/4/13 at 5:04 pm to CockRocket
quote:
You wanna bring up something from 1969 and last year that has no bearing on this game? arse. I promise you we score more than 20 and get the W.
No dullard. You can promise no such thing. I was merely pointing out the fact that your Chickens have never won anything of relevance. Except your 11 win rings and 1969 ACC championship.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 10/4/13 at 5:08 pm to Edearl Watson
Well if you need to bring up USC's lack of great success to make yourself feel better throughout the day, I'm not gonna stop you. You were, after all, the one to bring it up and to start flaming while no one provoked you.
You can't prove that Florida is a more complete team than USC this year so you have to go on a tangent about the past. Sad really.
You can't prove that Florida is a more complete team than USC this year so you have to go on a tangent about the past. Sad really.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 5:12 pm to CockRocket
Bullard is taking easleys spot inside. First game at dt, 1.5 sacks and a ton of disruptions. Missing easley absolutely hurt, but It's not going to destroy us we have recruited defense every bit as good as anyone in the country the past few years. Now we finally are landing five star offensive players too thank god.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 5:16 pm to CockRocket
quote:
You can't prove that Florida is a more complete team than USC this year so you have to go on a tangent about the past.
But you can promise that USC is more complete and will score more than 20 and win? amirite?
Truth is, I nor you can predict what will happen in the game. But I do promise you that UF beat USC 44-11 last season. Sad really.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 10/4/13 at 6:13 pm to 08Gatorbait
UF is a mini version of what LSU was like for a couple years. Good on D and relied on it to win games because the offense was a total shite burger.
I say mini version because the Defense Florida has isn't as good as the LSU defenses over that span.
I say mini version because the Defense Florida has isn't as good as the LSU defenses over that span.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 6:16 pm to 08Gatorbait
Pretty damn impressive, verified by the number of troll responses.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 6:18 pm to TigerB8
quote:
Defense Florida has isn't as good as the LSU defenses over that span.
UF's defense last year and this year (probably before the Easley injury) was just as good any defense LSU had has in the last 5-6 years.
Posted on 10/4/13 at 6:20 pm to 08Gatorbait
quote:
lsu couldn't even run vs Georgia
You're stupid. hill ran for 4.1 ypc. Lsu just didn't run much.
Posted on 10/5/13 at 11:00 am to Rickdaddy4188
Just heard this on espn.
2nd longest SEC streak for holding teams under 20 points is Bama with 1.
UF-11
Bama-1
Erebody else-0
2nd longest SEC streak for holding teams under 20 points is Bama with 1.
UF-11
Bama-1
Erebody else-0
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News