Started By
Message
If you could kick 2 schools out of the conference, who would they be and why?
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:45 pm
Serious question. Say re-alignment happened again but this time to trim the fat. (I'm not counting OK or UT because they aren't SEC yet.)
My 2 are Mizzou and Kentucky. They're too far north and just don't really fit. Mizzou is too woke, not really that good at any sports, and aren't even adding a lot academically. UK is an original member but they have mediocre academics, obviously only care about basketball, have awful fans, and have hideous colors.
My 2 are Mizzou and Kentucky. They're too far north and just don't really fit. Mizzou is too woke, not really that good at any sports, and aren't even adding a lot academically. UK is an original member but they have mediocre academics, obviously only care about basketball, have awful fans, and have hideous colors.
45
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:48 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Aggie and Mizzou…no explanation needed for Aggie…and Mizzou just doesn’t have that SEC feel to them.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:48 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Which sec state voted blue
I think there was only one
I think there was only one
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:49 pm to GainesvilleDawg
None of tCharter members
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:50 pm to GainesvilleDawg
I think your arguments are shite, but will play along with the question.
What criteria do you suggest be considered and then objectively assessed?
The SEC is an athletic conference, not a book club.
Ideally it makes money and entertains.
It enhances the college experience.
What else?
And then we can look at some metrics.
What criteria do you suggest be considered and then objectively assessed?
The SEC is an athletic conference, not a book club.
Ideally it makes money and entertains.
It enhances the college experience.
What else?
And then we can look at some metrics.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:52 pm to Genestealer55
quote:
doesn’t have that SEC feel to them.
What, like your sister?
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:53 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Missouri and Vandy
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:53 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
Which sec state voted blue
I think there was only one
Hell yea dude, let's bring politics onto this board. So fricking based.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:53 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Aggie and UT. Keep Mizzou and OU.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:54 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Texas and Oklahoma
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:54 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Only 2 Id go with Mizzou and A&M obviously but let's not stop there.
Arkie and South Carolina as well.
Lets get back to the real SEC.
Arkie and South Carolina as well.
Lets get back to the real SEC.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:55 pm to DirtyDawg
The OP said Missouri was too woke for the SEC
At least they went red
I’d be embarrassed too if I were you
At least they went red
I’d be embarrassed too if I were you
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:55 pm to Jrv2damac
What was it you said she flossed with a few weeks ago? I laughed but can’t remember now
This post was edited on 3/30/22 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:56 pm to piggilicious
I said it must suck to floss with a sock
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:56 pm to Jrv2damac
Oh yeah 
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:56 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
Which sec state voted blue
I think there was only one
/thread
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:56 pm to Jrv2damac
fire hose
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:57 pm to GainesvilleDawg
MSU: No need for 2 MS schools in a very small market
Vandy: zero commitment to football, Nashville market already taken with UT, SEC has plenty of other academically solid schools with Texas, aTm, UF, and UGA.
Vandy: zero commitment to football, Nashville market already taken with UT, SEC has plenty of other academically solid schools with Texas, aTm, UF, and UGA.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 4:00 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Auburn and Tennessee.
But for reason's other than that, in order:
Texas
Oklahoma
Missouri
Texas A&M
Because there was no need to go past 12 anyway.
And if you just want 12 teams without any reference to history or whatever.
Auburn
Texas
Vandy
Missouri
Auburn because they don't add anything. Texas because they think they add 100 times more than they do, Vandy and Missouri because they kind of suck in general.
But for reason's other than that, in order:
Texas
Oklahoma
Missouri
Texas A&M
Because there was no need to go past 12 anyway.
And if you just want 12 teams without any reference to history or whatever.
Auburn
Texas
Vandy
Missouri
Auburn because they don't add anything. Texas because they think they add 100 times more than they do, Vandy and Missouri because they kind of suck in general.
Posted on 3/30/22 at 4:03 pm to TouchdownTony
quote:
Id go with Mizzou and A&M obviously
The addition of these two put more money in your AD'S pocket than all other members combined over the last decade.
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News