Started By
Message
re: If SEC expanded, who would you absolutely not want
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:02 pm to bootyswamper
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:02 pm to bootyswamper
quote:
sewanee
I don't think they would be considered.
1
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:02 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Tulane and Ga Tech. They both had their chances and screwed the pooch
yep teach them bitches a lesson
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:03 pm to CatFan81
quote:
Neither does Kentucky, but were still in...
Ehh...I agree and disagree with you. When I went up to Lexington, I hung out with some people Friday at the Race Track and with them again Saturday. Granted, they were once involved in the Greek system, but I think the definitely fit the Southern stereotype.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:05 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
quote:
sewanee
I don't think they would be considered
i figured i would throw then in since they were among the orginal sec teams
This post was edited on 7/15/09 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:14 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
Ehh...I agree and disagree with you. When I went up to Lexington, I hung out with some people Friday at the Race Track and with them again Saturday. Granted, they were once involved in the Greek system, but I think the definitely fit the Southern stereotype.
Kentucky is such a mixed bag. Some people are more "southern"... but they are usually not from the Lexington/Louisville/Newport areas.
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 7/15/09 at 7:27 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
GA tech b/c more GA kids that want to play in the SEC would go there and that state produces a ton of talent and it has good geographical location within the SEC. It's not on a border.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 8:24 pm to Jhag
Florida State University..because they have great tradition, and one of the closest teams in the south, only abnout 140 miles south of Auburn, and very hot girls at this institution, good parties..
And I hear they run a very clean program.
Yeah, we need more teams on probation. Except not.
And I hear they run a very clean program.
Yeah, we need more teams on probation. Except not.
Posted on 7/15/09 at 8:32 pm to HeartOfGeauxld
FSU wouldn't come into the SEC when we asked them. Screw them. They were pussys then, they are pussys now.
UNC or Clemson would be a nice addition.
UNC or Clemson would be a nice addition.
This post was edited on 7/15/09 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 7/15/09 at 9:16 pm to LSUbase13
DON'T WANT: Clemson, A&M (Any Texas team, really)
DO WANT: FSU (They have awesome tradition, fans, campus, women, and already have a huge rivalry with UF), and I guess Louisville for the West? I can't think of a better school to add for the West so...
DO WANT: FSU (They have awesome tradition, fans, campus, women, and already have a huge rivalry with UF), and I guess Louisville for the West? I can't think of a better school to add for the West so...
Posted on 7/16/09 at 12:57 am to Acadien
I say LSU and Clemson become divisional rivals and the loser has to change their stadium nickname. 
Posted on 7/16/09 at 1:24 am to enomus1
I would not want Ga. Tech......bunch of whiney crybabies. 
Posted on 7/16/09 at 7:54 am to mvice2lsuPURPLERAIN
USM, Ga. Tech, Tulane, SFU, or CFU really bring nothing to the table as for as expanding the SEC market reach.
I would consider:
TCU (Dallas Market)
Rutger (New York/New Jersey Market)
Those teams would increase the SEC fan reach and a nice increase of TV money into the SEC.
I would consider:
TCU (Dallas Market)
Rutger (New York/New Jersey Market)
Those teams would increase the SEC fan reach and a nice increase of TV money into the SEC.
Posted on 7/16/09 at 8:44 am to Zephyrius
quote:
Rutger (New York/New Jersey Market)
When hell freezes over.
Posted on 7/16/09 at 9:09 am to akantho
quote:
Rutger (New York/New Jersey Market)
Really?? Lets just add some teams out west or hell, add Hawaii while we are at it.
This post was edited on 7/16/09 at 10:32 am
Posted on 7/16/09 at 11:38 am to Boomski
I few that might be considered:
Louisville, FSU, Virginia, V-Tech, Clemson,
G-Tech, USM.
Louisville, FSU, Virginia, V-Tech, Clemson,
G-Tech, USM.
Posted on 7/16/09 at 11:43 am to Boomski
While I would love the local school, Rutgers, to get into a real conference, the SEC is head and shoulders over them. I can't stand the Big ten and while I know it would be a great thing for Rutgers I don't want to be in big Ten Country. Rutgers wou;d fit better with the ACC and is 3 1/2 hours north of College Park.
The SEC would need a place that would bring new markets in West Va or Missouri
The SEC would need a place that would bring new markets in West Va or Missouri
Posted on 7/16/09 at 2:02 pm to Zephyrius
TCU is actually a damn good idea. dallas is not much further west than Fayetteville.
Posted on 7/16/09 at 3:13 pm to miledawg
We don't need any Yankee schools like the ACC added. We don't need to move out west. We don't want pussy FSU, remember Bowden didn't want to play Bama and Auburn in the same season. The SEC doesn't need anything or anyone. We're already the richest conference in America and have the highest game attendance on game day in America. Why try to fix a perfect system?
Posted on 7/16/09 at 3:42 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
except MAYBE Southern Miss
USM=Tulane...they would get skull fricked every week in the SEC......
Posted on 7/16/09 at 4:39 pm to athletemed
quote:
USM=Tulane...they would get skull fricked every week in the SEC......
That's one school of thought, based on the fact talent in a small state is already stretched between two SEC schools.
Another thought is that USM is in a unique position relative to UM/MSU, based on geography.
It's closer to Mobile and New Orleans, and a short drive to the Gulf Coast.
It's possible that USM could overtake the already established SEC schools, with the right athletic administration in place.
The flip side is there are currently no signs of that.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News