Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:09 pm to Ala Tide
quote:
Since you're avoiding the question, I'm going to assume you made that shite up and you've never attended a Catholic school in your life.
The bread and wine are literally the body and blood of Christ in the Catholic belief structure. Even if it doesn't look/smell/taste like it.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:12 pm to ECUtider
quote:
That little circular piece of bread is NOT human flesh, so just stop.
You by being Catholic claim to believe this. I personally don't think it is. I've dropped two links in this thread. Read them.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:12 pm to Duke
quote:
Many of the Fathers declare that the true Flesh of Jesus (sarx) is not to be understood as separated from His Divinity (spiritus), and hence not in a cannibalistic sense, but as belonging entirely to the supernatural economy.
Your own link proved you wrong.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:17 pm to BurasTigah
If Auburn and Notre Dame played Tim Tebow wouldn't give a shite who won.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:21 pm to Ala Tide
quote:
Your own link proved you wrong.
That part in context please. I was told of miracles involving the host during consecration turning into real human flesh. Also many of the Fathers doesn't sound very definite in my humble opinion.
It's not literally cannibalism, but that's the fun of wordplay. To explain my understanding of the subject, it's basically transformed into the body and blood in essence, but is in the form of bread. It obviously isn't like holding human flesh in your hands and chowing down. This was always a point made very clear to me in every religion class I took in HS. What do you, as a Catholic I assume, believe on the subject?
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:25 pm to Duke
To add more context...
You know when you walk up to receive communion and you are told "The Body of Christ" you say "amen".
Amen literally means "truly" if translated to English.
You know when you walk up to receive communion and you are told "The Body of Christ" you say "amen".
Amen literally means "truly" if translated to English.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:26 pm to ECUtider
quote:
( which was the original Christian church)
Uh No...That would be Orthodox, and although Catholicism is similar its not the same.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:40 pm to rooster108bm
Oh okay get technical. Either way, protestants split from Catholicism
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:45 pm to rooster108bm
quote:
Uh No...That would be Orthodox, and although Catholicism is similar its not the same.
They are both the original christian church. The Great Schism split them in two, but they have the same origin.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:46 pm to ECUtider
Protestants also practice the Lords supper. If that makes me a cannibal....oh well
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:47 pm to Duke
Dang, so that prick wasn't even right
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:49 pm to Duke
quote:
They are both the original christian church. The Great Schism split them in two, but they have the same origin.
So since the Prtestants split from Catholics, that makes them the original Christians too.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:53 pm to ECUtider
quote:
Dang, so that prick wasn't even right
Yes, actually I was. The original apostles formed the Orthodox church. And the five original churches are still orthodox to this day. prick
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:54 pm to rooster108bm
Yeah, but the fundamental difference is that Protestants made the church the way they wanted it to be, not the way the original Christians founded it as. Prime example is the King James bible, which just completely leaves out four books found in the Catholic bible.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:56 pm to rooster108bm
quote:
Yes, actually I was. The original apostles formed the Orthodox church. And the five original churches are still orthodox to this day. prick
Peter was the first Pope. He isn't one of the apostles?
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:58 pm to Duke
Catholicism/Orthodoxy were one in the same until the split. prick
Posted on 2/6/11 at 4:58 pm to ECUtider
quote:
Yeah, but the fundamental difference is that Protestants made the church the way they wanted it to be, not the way the original Christians founded it as. Prime example is the King James bible, which just completely leaves out four books found in the Catholic bible.
The books left out are Old Testament anyway. So the difference is really insignificant.
Posted on 2/6/11 at 5:06 pm to ECUtider
quote:
were one in the same until the split. prick
You said the magic word there....WERE...
Posted on 2/6/11 at 5:17 pm to MaroonNation
While this isn't nearly as old and unoriginal as the ol "Who will we replace Auburn with when they get the death penalty" topic, it still sucks pretty bad.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News