Started By
Message
How would have a better future, Eason or Hurt?
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:48 pm
I like both qbs, but sometimes I feel like a lot of Bama wide receivers make their qbs seem better then they're. I go with Eason
11
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Hurts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
You're not even trying 
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Hey monteg,
Josh Dobbs just scored again
Josh Dobbs just scored again
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Not sure HOW... 
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Eason is what the pros look for in a QB.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:49 pm to JohnMwan
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:50 pm to JohnMwan
quote:
How would have a better future, Eason or Hurt?
Playing better than the other is how.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:52 pm to JohnMwan
Stop trolling dude. Your self esteem is going to remain shitty even if a few tards bite. Just stop.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:52 pm to JohnMwan
quote:
How would have a better future, Eason or Hurt?
Not only butchering the English language, but this doesn't even make sense if correct grammar is used.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 3:54 pm to sunseeker
You think I'm trolling because I didn't pick an Alabama player?
Posted on 10/4/16 at 4:33 pm to JohnMwan
Hurts will win a national title but Eason will be a better QB.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 4:34 pm to Vols&Shaft83
it's not monteg.
Posted on 10/4/16 at 4:36 pm to WG_Dawg
Hurt will likely play for multiple national titles.
Eason is likely to play in the NFL for a long time.
It all depends on what you value more. Short term, unquestionably Hurt. Long term, very likely Eason.
Eason is likely to play in the NFL for a long time.
It all depends on what you value more. Short term, unquestionably Hurt. Long term, very likely Eason.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News