Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:18 pm to Wild Thang
Agree. He makes good decisions. If the WRs could stop dropping the ball, this offense would be unreal.
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:18 pm to cas4t
Clearly a troll thread
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:18 pm to Old Sarge
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:21 pm to GnashRebel
I agree. I think it'd be surprising for any team. But especially LSU given the offensive woes we've experienced in recent years.
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:23 pm to cas4t
INT = 3 (Allen=2; Murray=1)
FUMBLES-LOST = 7-3
FUMBLES-LOST = 7-3
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:25 pm to EKG
honestly not too surprising when you take into account that A&M plays fast and throws it so much. LSU is much more conservative and has a now known commodity.
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:26 pm to GnashRebel
quote:
That is a surprising statistic for LSU.
eh, LSU running backs have always been known for good ball security, and LSU hasn't been passing the ball enough or been aggressive enough for there to be a lot of chances to make mistakes in the passing game
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:27 pm to cas4t
5 seconds on Google:
Rank Name Turn. Margin Fum. Rec. Int. Total Lost
1 Mississippi 6 3 7 4
2 Tennessee 5 3 3 1
3 South Carolina 3 1 4 2
3 Georgia 3 0 5 2
5 LSU 2 1 1 0
5 Kentucky 2 2 4 4
5 Florida 2 2 4 4
5 Arkansas 2 2 3 3
9 Missouri 0 2 4 6
10 Alabama -2 3 2 7
10 Texas A&M -2 2 2 6
10 Mississippi State -2 0 2 4
13 Auburn -5 1 2 8
14 Vanderbilt -7 1 0 8
SEC Turnover
Rank Name Turn. Margin Fum. Rec. Int. Total Lost
1 Mississippi 6 3 7 4
2 Tennessee 5 3 3 1
3 South Carolina 3 1 4 2
3 Georgia 3 0 5 2
5 LSU 2 1 1 0
5 Kentucky 2 2 4 4
5 Florida 2 2 4 4
5 Arkansas 2 2 3 3
9 Missouri 0 2 4 6
10 Alabama -2 3 2 7
10 Texas A&M -2 2 2 6
10 Mississippi State -2 0 2 4
13 Auburn -5 1 2 8
14 Vanderbilt -7 1 0 8
SEC Turnover
This post was edited on 9/29/15 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:29 pm to Broncothor
googling is no fun at all. You must be a millennial.
I also don't understand how those rankings work. Can you google the formula for me?
I also don't understand how those rankings work. Can you google the formula for me?
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:32 pm to cas4t
Sure. Or you can just read the headings.
LSU is tied for 5th in net turnovers.
LSU is tied for 5th in net turnovers.
This post was edited on 9/29/15 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:34 pm to Broncothor
So basically we don't turn it over and also haven't forced many turnovers?
also, for reference, when you provide stats (or anything really) that came from somewhere else on the internet, it's common knowledge that you also provide a link for the other readers.
thanks for the contribution
also, for reference, when you provide stats (or anything really) that came from somewhere else on the internet, it's common knowledge that you also provide a link for the other readers.
thanks for the contribution
This post was edited on 9/29/15 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:37 pm to Broncothor
quote:
LSU is 5th in net turnovers.
FIFY
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:38 pm to craigbiggio
also could be tied for 4th
technically
technically
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:39 pm to cas4t
SC is 2nd in the SEC with 3 Turnovers lost.
SC is also 2nd in the SEC in Turnover Margin at 1.00
SC is also 2nd in the SEC in Turnover Margin at 1.00
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:39 pm to cas4t
You're 100% correct
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:40 pm to craigbiggio
You are correct, I missed the negatives.
Link added for the google-impaired.
Link added for the google-impaired.
Posted on 9/29/15 at 2:40 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
SC is 2nd in the SEC with 3 Turnovers lost.
I thought Tennessee has 2? And LSU has 0?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News