Started By
Message

re: How does a University monitor a player with agents?

Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:22 pm to
Posted by rolltide06
Member since Jun 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Problem is, like with what supposedly happened with fluker, what keeps them from opening up more accounts.


Exactly. There is no way to completely stop this.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:25 pm to
Really need to partner with the nfl more and hit them with major fines. Only way to stop them is the root of the problem in the first place. And not just minor fines, like portion of contract type fines.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83443 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Not really, if they played an inelligible player, knowing or not, they can get in trouble.


You're right, they can. But teams have also gotten off with playing ineligible players. If the school goes through the right steps reporting everything. Let's hope Alabama did.

They seem to have done a good job of it under Saban so far.
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Really need to partner with the nfl more and hit them with major fines. Only way to stop them is the root of the problem in the first place. And not just minor fines, like portion of contract type fines.

I like this idea a lot. If you are found taking impermissible benefits in college and cannot be punished due to no longer being in college, you pay the price in the NFL through fines or suspensions. This is something I highly doubt the NFLPA would ever allow.

This seems to be something that would be circumvented or at the very least discouraged if full cost of attendance was covered.
This post was edited on 9/11/13 at 7:41 pm
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:32 pm to
I believe they already rejected it.
Posted by rolltide06
Member since Jun 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Really need to partner with the nfl more and hit them with major fines. Only way to stop them is the root of the problem in the first place. And not just minor fines, like portion of contract type fines.


This is a great idea.
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:44 pm to
I would think so. There are probably plenty of players currently in the NFL who received benefits, so if they were caught, they would basically be setting themselves up for a fine.
Posted by WreckingCrue
Member since Aug 2013
765 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:51 pm to
The way that it is done ensures only the scum bag (highly successful) agents get meetings.

If an agent follows university and state law he never even sees a player.
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9111 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:53 pm to
"If the school doesn't know"

This may help mitigate serious future penalties (scholly reductions, postseason bans) but my understanding is it won't help Alabama with avoiding the 2011 and 2012 titles being vacated. Heck, we did absolutely everything we could possibly be expected to do as an institution during the textbook case but still had to vacate every game the 5 players involved in played in. Unless I'm missing something I don't see how that part of this situation won't end up being just like the textbook case.

And I'm trying to understand why this attorney/agent is sending money to Luther Davis. How can anyone who is apparently this successful be stupid enough to send or wire money that is illegal by NCAA rules and that can be so easily traced? That's the most puzzling thing to me. My first instinct that we have some boosters that are so arrogant to think they can be so blatant in wiring money and not get caught. On the other hand, said booster can't possibly that stupid and the money was the payments between an agent and a player when Davis was his NFL client . Just thinking out loud. I always think the worst when it comes to these type stories come out so I'll assume the worst.
This post was edited on 9/11/13 at 7:54 pm
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

it won't help Alabama with avoiding the 2011 and 2012 titles being vacated
Unless I am missing something, why would 2011 be vacated? Everything supposedly happened after.
This post was edited on 9/11/13 at 7:58 pm
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter