Started By
Message
re: How do you grade your teams spring game performance?
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:43 pm to Gus Bus Driver
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:43 pm to Gus Bus Driver
It is pointless to try to evaluate a team based on a spring game.
3
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:43 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Specifically, what about the way he played told you that his footwork has improved?
His passes were much more accurate. He also went to secondary receivers better than he did last season. His throws were much crisper. It was obvious he has improved tremendously from last season. He still needs to improve, but apparently he is a hard worker. How do I know this? Nick started working with his WR's the day after the NC game. How do I know this? The announcers talked about how Auburn WR's told them this. I hope this answers all of your questions.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:44 pm to Cockopotamus
It can be a good way to evaluate individuals though, and that can give you a peek into a potential future for the team as a whole.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:47 pm to MrAUTigers
So nick marshall stole the show?
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:48 pm to deeprig9
Apparently he stole your heart and showed it to you while it was still beating.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:51 pm to deeprig9
quote:You could say that
So nick marshall stole the show?
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:52 pm to MrAUTigers
Why are you angry? I havent watched their spring game. I want to know more about Marshall's improved footwork and crisper passes on the secondary routes. Is there a link or anything? Id love to watch him play.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:56 pm to deeprig9
Posted on 4/21/14 at 4:58 pm to deeprig9
Offense- B
Defense-B
ST- A (for the day. Kicker was actually making kicks)
Defense-B
ST- A (for the day. Kicker was actually making kicks)
Posted on 4/21/14 at 5:18 pm to gatordmb89
Ill let you know saturday
Posted on 4/21/14 at 5:37 pm to Cockopotamus
Not really. Matt Joeckel moved the ball at will against the 2013 first team defense.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 5:40 pm to deeprig9
quote:
It can be a good way to evaluate individuals though, and that can give you a peek into a potential future for the team as a whole.
Meh I still think they're pretty pointless from that aspect as well
Posted on 4/21/14 at 5:46 pm to darkhorse
quote:
Same as MSU. We just don't have a real good team. QB can't pass. WRs not catching. Run game is horrible. Defense lost a lot. Good thing is we have a great FG kicker now.
Pretty spot on. It will come down to the egg bowl if we go bowling or not and we will definitely lose that one in oxford
Posted on 4/21/14 at 5:48 pm to Mstate
quote:
It will come down to the egg bowl if we go bowling or not and we will definitely lose that one in oxford
BS. This will be Merlin's best team at MSU. I look for them to win at least 9 games this year.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 7:42 pm to Gus Bus Driver
Offense - D+
Defense - A
Special Teams - D-
Defense - A
Special Teams - D-
Posted on 4/21/14 at 7:49 pm to Gus Bus Driver
Z-
Posted on 4/21/14 at 8:50 pm to BradPitt
For Mizzou, I'm going to be using a rating system of A to A++++. A being the lowest and A++++ being the highest possible grade.
Offense: A++++
Defense: A++++
Special Teams: A++++
Offense: A++++
Defense: A++++
Special Teams: A++++
Posted on 4/21/14 at 8:52 pm to Gus Bus Driver
Offense: A+. Not mainly because of Dak, but his two backups were killin it.
Defense: B
ST: G-
Defense: B
ST: G-
Posted on 4/21/14 at 8:52 pm to Cockopotamus
Keep thinking that way.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News