Started By
Message
re: Here's the rule on the play that was ruled a completion for Auburn
Posted on 11/30/14 at 6:13 am to The_SwAUggford
Posted on 11/30/14 at 6:13 am to The_SwAUggford
Defender can have contact with the receiver until the ball is in the air...once pass is away, no more contact until ball arrives.
That's why there are no illegal contact penalties in college...
That's why there are no illegal contact penalties in college...
0
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:14 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
They could have ruled it an incomplete pass, but not an INT.
That is what I thought the call should have been.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:16 am to UsingUpAllTheLetters
quote:
The fact that Auburn snapped the ball on the next play was enough for me. Oh well. Double-digit win.
Allowing the replay after the play had been run was insane. It was as if the tinfoil hat wearing fools around here were right and the refs have a line to Slive's office.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:16 am to JustGetItRight
Why would anyone think it was an incomplete pass?
The ball was in possession (by SOMEBODY), feet were down in bounds, and the ball never hit the ground. It could be nothing BUT a possession decision, and the refs got it wrong even with replay.
The ball was in possession (by SOMEBODY), feet were down in bounds, and the ball never hit the ground. It could be nothing BUT a possession decision, and the refs got it wrong even with replay.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:18 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
What is the rule when:
Offensive player steps out of bounds 3 yards before first down. Line judge who is completely out of position runs to spot where offensive player steps out of bounds. The line judge realizes he is on offensive team's sideline and runs up field three yards, looks across field at first down marker and placES football down a foot in front of marker?
Rule number for that please? TIA lol
Offensive player steps out of bounds 3 yards before first down. Line judge who is completely out of position runs to spot where offensive player steps out of bounds. The line judge realizes he is on offensive team's sideline and runs up field three yards, looks across field at first down marker and placES football down a foot in front of marker?
Rule number for that please? TIA lol
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:19 am to iglass
I did not think either had it really in possession. I did not think Sylve secured it until his right foot was out.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:22 am to Tigerman97
If the refs had a direct line to Slive, then why did the call go against us? You'd think if we really were paying the refs we would have got the interception, or at the very least it ruled an incomplete pass.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:23 am to JustGetItRight
I am surprised by the concern with officiating last night. All in all it was a good game. Some of the stuff mentioned wasn't that bad, the phantom hold in my opinion was on the left guard and they said the wrong players number. The review should have never been allowed, but even if it was to say there was evidence to overturn the call on the field is stretching. It might have been the wrong call but it wasn't the wrong review. All in all I thought they did a good job, better than most games this season.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:25 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Got fricked on the INT and the neutral zone infraction. But Bama doesn't bitch about calls, we overcome them.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:25 am to chattabama
quote:
If the refs had a direct line to Slive, then why did the call go against us? You'd think if we really were paying the refs we would have got the interception, or at the very least it ruled an incomplete pass.
I don't think that nonsense. I think all the people complaining about refs are generally excuse makers in life. I have never seen a play completely run where no official made any motion about stopping the play and then after the fact saying my ear piece was being buzzed so the play doesn't count. See my last post about the game, I thought it was all in all officiated well.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:26 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Got fricked on the INT and the neutral zone infraction. But Bama doesn't bitch about calls, we overcome them.
Quantifying your complaining by stating you overcome it doesn't mean you aren't still complaining.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:27 am to auburnphan23
quote:
auburnphan23
Dude you have issues. You need a break.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:28 am to stat19
can we link the play in question please
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:30 am to Tigerman97
quote:
Quantifying your complaining by stating you overcome it doesn't mean you aren't still complaining.
Saying it happened isn't complaining.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:31 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Saying it happened isn't complaining.
You say potato, I say potato.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:33 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Why don't you link the fox sports article you copy and pasted, Forrest? Oh right. You wanted to look like you were smart and did research and shite. That's sweet.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:36 am to Tigerman97
South Carolina had the same thing happen to them before.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:36 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
I didn't agree with the ruling either, but at least there is proof now that the refs aren't Bama fans.
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:38 am to labamafan
I thought the DB landed out of bounds anyway. So at best it's an incompletion
Posted on 11/30/14 at 8:39 am to Bow to Auburn
can we link the play in question please
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News