Started By
Message
re: Help locating 2012 SEC schedules
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:02 am to DaleDenton
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:02 am to DaleDenton
quote:
because it Arkansas has an unfair advantage playing at Uncle Jerry's...
Why?
1
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:03 am to LoyalTiger
quote:
Why?
Apparently, playing a texas team in texas is an advantage for Arkansas.
Aggie logic.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:06 am to winyahpercy
quote:
i understand they are working through the non-conference contracts to implement a 9 conference schedule like the B10, which will then allow Auburn to move to the East and Mizzou to the West. (1 perm and 2 rotating). Bama-UT would still be discontinued, but it wouldn't take as long w/ the rotation w/ 2 rotating games like it is now.
Teams are staying in the same division just going to a 9 game. Basically the same as 2011 just one more division game.
UGA, UT, UA, & UF only voted on Mizzou coming in, if Auburn stayed in the West. UF & UGA didnt want AU in the east and UT & UA didnt want to lose their rivalry
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:18 am to WG_Dawg
One of the issues that I know is maybe holding it up is that we need a 12th game since A&M was our OOC game and now they are a conference game.
This post was edited on 12/21/11 at 11:19 am
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:20 am to wmr
quote:
One of the issues that I know is maybe holding it up is that we need a 12th game since A&M was our OOC game and now they are a conference game.
Part of it, we need the SEC schedule to be released to schedule a cupcake, but really we want a home and home with a quality opponent so the SEC schedule is on hold to see if it needs to be tweaked for this to happen.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:20 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Teams are staying in the same division just going to a 9 game. Basically the same as 2011 just one more division game.
UGA, UT, UA, & UF only voted on Mizzou coming in, if Auburn stayed in the West. UF & UGA didnt want AU in the east and UT & UA didnt want to lose their rivalry
i don't understand why UGA would care because they have to play them every year. and UT used to have a good rivalry w/ Auburn. i don't disagree w/ your info, but i think Mizzou has to go back to the West or they'll never be able to build their program. the need to play the teams in their region regularly to help them w/ recruiting. also, having Mizzou in the East taxes the other East schools/fans that will have travel out there every other year.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:22 am to Bama98
Not released until next week. Wanted them out by Xmas but they are pushed back to make sure the bye weeks are distributed equally.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 11:31 am to winyahpercy
quote:
i don't understand why UGA would care because they have to play them every year.
Now they would have to compete with them in the east
quote:
and UT used to have a good rivalry w/ Auburn
We had a bigger one with UF as well. UT was about losing their rivalry with Bama if we moved to the east.
quote:
but i think Mizzou has to go back to the West or they'll never be able to build their program. the need to play the teams in their region regularly to help them w/ recruiting. also, having Mizzou in the East taxes the other East schools/fans that will have travel out there every other year.
Agree, but it is what it is until they make the move to 16
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News