Started By
Message
Georgia transfer QB Jaden Rashada is suing Billy Napier, Marcus Castro-Walker, others.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:49 am
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:49 am
This is the new world we live in.
7
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:50 am to fastlane
blahahahahahahahahaa
I’ve told ppl for years 90% of the bullgators are such bad businessmen playing around with granddaddy’s money that even a 19 year old kid can successfully sue them! Balahahahahbahaha
I’ve told ppl for years 90% of the bullgators are such bad businessmen playing around with granddaddy’s money that even a 19 year old kid can successfully sue them! Balahahahahbahaha
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:53 am to theCAW
You must hate the Griffins. 
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:53 am to fastlane
Scared money don’t make money - Billy
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:59 am to fastlane
quote:
Reports indicate that Florida promised Rashada a four-year contract worth $13.85 million. According to On3.com, Rashada is suing on counts of fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, civil conspiracy to commit fraud, negligent misrepresentations, tortious interference, aiding and abetting tortious interference and vicarious liability.
Sounds like a natural leader and true team player.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:00 am to fastlane
The timing of this makes sense.
Before the Tennessee lawsuit against the NCAA, it was against the rules for boosters/teams to offer NIL deals to players to get them to attend their college.
If Rashada had sued before that point, he'd be unable to play because of those rules.
Now that the courts have decided it's okay to pay players to come to your school, Rashada can safely sue UF or their boosters for breach of contract (even if it was just a verbal contract) without losing the ability to play for his current team.
Before the Tennessee lawsuit against the NCAA, it was against the rules for boosters/teams to offer NIL deals to players to get them to attend their college.
If Rashada had sued before that point, he'd be unable to play because of those rules.
Now that the courts have decided it's okay to pay players to come to your school, Rashada can safely sue UF or their boosters for breach of contract (even if it was just a verbal contract) without losing the ability to play for his current team.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:28 am to Hback
quote:not his fault Napier and the uaa are completely incompetent money launderers
Sounds like a natural leader and true team player.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:34 am to theCAW
quote:
I’ve told ppl for years 90% of the bullgators are such bad businessmen playing around with granddaddy’s money that even a 19 year old kid can successfully sue them!
Jealousy will eat you alive from the inside out. Let that stuff go man!
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 9:38 am
Posted on 5/21/24 at 9:40 am to theCAW
No wonder you get no pussy
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:24 am to Hogfan13
quote:I’m way more successful than all those losers
Jealousy will eat you alive from the inside out. Let that stuff go man!
Came from nothing to being worth multi millions
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:25 am to SCDawg95
quote:actually I’ve shown and proven many times on here that I do just fine despite running many businesses and have little time for all that
No wonder you get no pussy
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:29 am to theCAW
quote:
actually I’ve shown and proven many times on here that I do just fine despite running many businesses and have little time for all that
Yet you have time to make 2,500 posts on here in less than 6 months. Sure buddy, we believe you.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:32 am to fastlane
quote:Yep, open season on HC’s cash.
This is the new world we live in.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:37 am to Hogfan13
quote:you seem jealous of the caw
Hogfan13
Get in line
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:39 am to DawginSC
quote:
Before the Tennessee lawsuit against the NCAA, it was against the rules for boosters/teams to offer NIL deals to players to get them to attend their college.
If Rashada had sued before that point, he'd be unable to play because of those rules.
Now that the courts have decided it's okay to pay players to come to your school, Rashada can safely sue UF or their boosters for breach of contract (even if it was just a verbal contract) without losing the ability to play for his current team.
Yeah, I don't think it works that way. Changing the law doesnt give you a right of action two years later for something that already happened.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:41 am to Hogfan13
quote:I’ve literally proven it many times here
Sure buddy, we believe you
Clearly another UAA plant
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:46 am to fastlane
The players haven't lost a suit yet. And this is the only way this kid is going to make anything at this point. He probably will never play a down at UGA
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:47 am to theCAW
“Worth multi millions”. Wouldn’t the word millions imply “multi”?
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:47 am to truth22
quote:
Yeah, I don't think it works that way. Changing the law doesnt give you a right of action two years later for something that already happened.
This wasn't a legislative body changing a law.
This was a court case which determined the NCAA's rules about banning pay to play were illegal.
Not illegal as of the date of the decision, but ALWAYS illegal.
So yes, it does mean that even two years later, the NCAA won't be able to take away Rashada's ability to play now that he's admitting to be involved in pay to play. That opens him up to sue Florida boosters for not honoring a contract that was paying him to sign with Florida (which he actually did) without losing the ability to play college football because of it.
2 years is well within any statute of limitations. The timing is no problem there.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 10:48 am to bigDgator
quote:
You must hate the Griffins.
He hates Florida. He’s not a Florida fan by any stretch. He should be banned from the Florida board.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News