Started By
Message
re: Future Schedule Requirements and Who Has Work to Do
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:33 pm to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:33 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
With USCe but not assume UK continues to play UofL like they've have for the last 20 or so years now?
20 years in comparison to other games is not really an indicator of the future and especially with the changes being made, thats why I did not follow the same assumption.
quote:
Also why would any AD in their right mind have signed a longer contract than through '18-ish with the way the football conference landscape has been the last 3 years and the SEC not deciding until now to not go with the 9 game schedule?
if you are referring to the rivalry contracts, they usually last more than just a few years
quote:
I don't see anyone having issues at this point.
There are several teams that dont have a '15 game, usually these are scheduled more than a year out
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:34 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
At years '15 through '20 , sorry the apostrophe is in the wrong location. But please continue
I don't mean to be the grammar Nazi, but I use it for feet all day every day and I just can't read 15' without it being "Fifteen feet".
Try reading your post with every instance of an apostrophe as "foot". I couldn't get through it.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:34 pm to NYCAuburn
That was Whiskey not MSU.
And Whiskey wasn't canceled, it never was agreed upon for scheduling.
And Whiskey wasn't canceled, it never was agreed upon for scheduling.
This post was edited on 5/20/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:36 pm to nc14
quote:
That was Whiskey not MSU.
No, it was MSU, just posted on here the other day
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:36 pm to nc14
yes Wisconsin was the one that didn't want to do a neutral site.... until they did
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:37 pm to NYCAuburn
I know the reason our contract with UofL hadn't been extended again was because of their move to the ACC (which has effected the time of year we play) and the SEC up until recently settling on not playing a 9 game schedule. Now that it's settled, I don't see any reason it won't be.
So I'm not at all surprised teams "have work to do". I don't know why anyone is really surprised by that.
So I'm not at all surprised teams "have work to do". I don't know why anyone is really surprised by that.
This post was edited on 5/20/14 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:38 pm to skrayper
We also had a Georgia Tech home and home that got cancelled for '18-'19.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:38 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:39 pm to Wallacewade04
Oh stop using facts in here.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:40 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
I thought it was canceled because Bama wouldnt play in Lansing, they wanted a home/neutral
Ya, it was. frick EL. What a shithole. Makes Columbus look like Paris.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:41 pm to nc14
quote:
Here you go chief - home and home canceled due to SEC schedule uncertainty - per MSU AD.
LINK
There was another article last week that said it was cancelled when we asked to move the game in EL to a neutral site.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:48 pm to nc14
quote:. Well chief per the michigan ad the series was canceled because bama wanted to change the agreement and state wouldn't. But please go on
Here you go chief - home and home canceled due to SEC schedule uncertainty - per MSU AD. LINK
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:49 pm to TreyAnastasio
Show me dammit. It does not come up when googling. Was this a re-negotiation after the nine game conference schedule was voted down.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:50 pm to NYCAuburn
Tennessee is playing a B12 school in ATL in 17 and W. Virginia in Charlotte in 18. Rumored to be playing in Dallas and Nashville in 19 and 20.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:50 pm to NYCAuburn
Where are you reading that, I am interested?
Posted on 5/20/14 at 4:58 pm to TreyAnastasio
Thanks, had not seen or heard that. Intersting that he would change the story eight months later.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 5:04 pm to NYCAuburn
We're playing Michigan in 17.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News