Started By
Message
Foley and UF administration had a week
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:02 pm
to have a contingency plan worked up wether that be a neutral site or a change to BR. Foley even said a neutral site game was never considered. This storm has been forecasted to hit where it is for a week so there is no excuse not to have looked into this as a contingency plan knowing the hurricane was coming.
It was Gainesville or nothing and that is just a shame. Terrible leadership
It was Gainesville or nothing and that is just a shame. Terrible leadership
5
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:03 pm to tigamike
Same with the state as a whole.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:03 pm to tigamike
Foley is not our AD.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:04 pm to 0
quote:
Same with the state as a whole.
So mad.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:04 pm to tigamike
NOBODY wants to lose money. In a neutral site game unless the sec offices were going to cover travel expenses for Florida and give them the take why should they play neutral site game?
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:04 pm to roadGator
quote:
Foley is not our AD.
Yes he is. He doesn't retire until 11/1
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:05 pm to tigamike
They either gambled and lost, or this was their plan all along.
Either way it's a shame no one will be held accountable.
Either way it's a shame no one will be held accountable.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:06 pm to joshnorris14
I thought it was 10/1.
OK. Foley is POS and is our AD.
OK. Foley is POS and is our AD.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:07 pm to labamafan
quote:
NOBODY wants to lose money. In a neutral site game unless the sec offices were going to cover travel expenses for Florida and give them the take why should they play neutral site game?
Teams hosting events affected by natural disasters have moved their games or to other dates with in the same weekend numerous times. Why does UF feel they are better than those other schools? Why should the obligation be met by LSU as the visiting team when they offered to work towards all of the compromises that teams have accommodated in the past?
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:09 pm to Waffle House
Weird move by UF. I remember LSU opened up T.S. to plat USCe when their state was flooded. Yeah, attendance was down but it seemed LSU went out of their way to make it as "home like" and welcoming for USCe.
Did LSU offer to do the same for UF?
Did LSU offer to do the same for UF?
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:10 pm to labamafan
quote:
why should they play neutral site game?
Because their home venue has been compromised...this is not a diificult concept.
Well, maybe for Gumps and Floridians it is.
This post was edited on 10/6/16 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:10 pm to Ted2010
I'm sure they did. Gave all the money made to usce too I believe.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:10 pm to tigamike
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:13 pm to labamafan
quote:
NOBODY wants to lose money. In a neutral site game unless the sec offices were going to cover travel expenses for Florida and give them the take why should they play neutral site game?
Florida loses money either way because their plan involved giving up the home game on 11/19/2016
Posted on 10/6/16 at 5:14 pm to 0
quote:
I'm sure they did. Gave all the money made to usce too I believe.
I remember that. LF7 even auctioned off his jersey for South Carolina recovery. It was classy.
I know UF wouldnt want to lose a home game...but now they lost the game period. Weird.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News