Started By
Message
re: (Final Draft) Evidence Mounts of a Scandal in the SEC
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:42 am to joeyb147
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:42 am to joeyb147
quote:
Also, you forgot to add in Auburn in here since they got the schedule benefit.
4 - Auburn (LSU, Alabama, Georgia, Texas A&M)
But that throws a wrench in your conspiracy.
Haha.
0
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:43 am to joeyb147
quote:
But that throws a wrench in your conspiracy.
everything does, that why they twist the shite and leave shite out. its getting downright stupid at this point.
Is there any other fanbase currently that is as crazy and bitchy as LSU right now? I open to suggestions, however I don't see any
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:45 am to joeyb147
quote:not really... all four are permanent opponents. we're specifically discussing rotational opponents.
4 - Auburn (LSU, Alabama, Georgia, Texas A&M)
But that throws a wrench in your conspiracy.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:46 am to Wideman
quote:
not really... all four are permanent opponents. we're specifically discussing rotational opponents.
you cant be this dumb.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:46 am to NYCAuburn
I love these threads.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:47 am to NYCAuburn
quote:this entire discussion revolves around the rotational schedule. all of the bitching from LSU fans during the past year is based solely upon the bridge schedule fricking up that rotation.
you cant be this dumb.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:47 am to Wideman
quote:
not really... all four are permanent opponents. we're specifically discussing rotational opponents.
Oh, so since we schedule most of the hard opponents permanently, it's a conspiracy wen the weaker opponents show up on our rotating schedule?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:47 am to Wideman
quote:
Wideman
I was referring to your previous comment,
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:48 am to NYCAuburn
quote:which one?
I was referring to your previous comment,
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:49 am to Wideman
quote:
this entire discussion revolves around the rotational schedule. all of the bitching from LSU fans during the past year is based solely upon the bridge schedule fricking up that rotation.
Yeah, LSU fans haven't been bitching about UF being their permanent opponent at all.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:51 am to LA kid but AU fan
quote:that was some ongoing, light-hearted complaints from a select few.
Yeah, LSU fans haven't been bitching about UF being their permanent opponent at all.
This whole bridge schedule has unleashed hell (in case you haven't noticed from reading the rant the past 8 months).
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:51 am to Wideman
the one I quoted. The whole op is a fail, its narrow minded and short sighted and leaves off "stats" and "facts" that contradict the premise. which has been pretty much identical to all the arguments thus far from one side
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:53 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:to be fair, i don't think there is a conspiracy. But logically, it didn't throw a wrench in that bitch fest, because that post (the one that showed Auburn playing four of the top six) included all permanent opponents in a thread bitching about rotational opponents.
Oh, so since we schedule most of the hard opponents permanently, it's a conspiracy wen the weaker opponents show up on our rotating schedule?
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 11:54 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:54 am to NYCAuburn
The thing that makes this thread better than other Lsu crying threafs, is it was made by McAnus.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:54 am to McManus
Arkansas should be playing Georgia this year.
What the bridge schedules are doing is quickly rotating through the opposite division teams so that aTm/Mizzou can play all before the final, and what is likely going to be slow, rotation begins. This will allow them to play all the opponents in half the time instead of close to a decade before facing opposing division opponents.
There deciding factor between home and away games seems to be what is needed to give an even 4/4 split between the games, this may also be the factor deciding to rotate forward/backwards the opponent.
Basically if LSU isn't good enough to win the schedule before them, enjoy your Chic-fil-a Bowls, less schedule conspiracy/bitching is needed from your fanbase...
What the bridge schedules are doing is quickly rotating through the opposite division teams so that aTm/Mizzou can play all before the final, and what is likely going to be slow, rotation begins. This will allow them to play all the opponents in half the time instead of close to a decade before facing opposing division opponents.
There deciding factor between home and away games seems to be what is needed to give an even 4/4 split between the games, this may also be the factor deciding to rotate forward/backwards the opponent.
Basically if LSU isn't good enough to win the schedule before them, enjoy your Chic-fil-a Bowls, less schedule conspiracy/bitching is needed from your fanbase...
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:55 am to Wideman
quote:
But logically, it didn't throw a wrench in that bitch fest, because that post (the one that showed Auburn playing four of the top six) included all permanent opponents in a thread bitching about rotational opponents.
Then he shouldn't have included the permanent opponents for the other 6 teams either. He did it because 4 vs. 2 looks a lot bigger than 2 vs. 1.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:55 am to Wideman
quote:
that was some ongoing, light-hearted complaints from a select few.
Yeah, like your HC.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:56 am to Wideman
quote:So we want to talk about "fair" and "unfair" and scheduling, but not include that if Auburn played UF this year, it would put Auburn playing 5 of the top 6 teams in the SEC?
because that post included all permanent opponents in a thread bitching about rotational opponents.
But I'm sure LSU fans really want fair across the board as shown...
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 11:58 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:56 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:yup.
Then he shouldn't have included the permanent opponents for the other 6 teams either. He did it because 4 vs. 2 looks a lot bigger than 2 vs. 1.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 11:58 am to joeyb147
quote:to be honest, i don't think many LSU fans care who Auburn plays this year. they just want Bama to play as tough of opponents as the rest of us...
So we want to talk about "fair" and "unfair" and scheduling, but not include that if Auburn played UF this year, it would put Auburn playing 5 of the top 6 teams in the SEC?
But I'm sure LSU fans really want fair across the board...
Page 2 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News