Started By
Message

re: ESPY winning catch by Landry

Posted on 11/29/13 at 7:01 pm to
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24848 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 7:01 pm to
I feel bad for him that there isnt a better camera angle. That is one of those highlights his kids and grandkids would love to have a perfect camera shot of.
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

You are allowed to make incidental contact with the receiver (or defender) when "competing" for the ball. Call it what you want but that's the verbiage that is used.

Now you change your claim to something entirely different. ....
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10314 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Now you change your claim to something entirely different. ....


Not at all. If the defender (or receiver) is making a play on the ball or "competing for the ball" and he makes incidental contact with the opponent in the process - it's not interference. That is exactly what Landry did. An Arkansas defender did it to an LSU receiver in the first quarter too. A penalty wasn't called on either play.
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9847 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 8:31 pm to
He was going for the ball. No PI.

#BOSS
Posted by la champ1
Member since Oct 2012
1435 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

hg ESPY winning catch by Landry OFFENSIVE PASS INTERFERENCE


Disagree. As long as Landry didn't push off, he has as much right to go for that ball as the defender. He never pushed off, he went for the ball which is why the ref did not call.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter