Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:25 pm to Choctaw
and by the end of the season Mizzou will be there and one of those west teams won't.. "not naming names.. oink oink oink"
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:25 pm to EKG
This is some computer generated garbage. I don't care if LSU is slotted in the top 5. I'll wait for the actually preseason poll, which is done by the SID's and not some damn computer.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:25 pm to Choctaw
Ranked way too high:
Baylor
LSU
A&M
Ole Miss
Bit high, but I can stomach it:
Oregon
Arkansas
Georgia
Bout right:
Ohio St
Bama
TCU
Baylor
LSU
A&M
Ole Miss
Bit high, but I can stomach it:
Oregon
Arkansas
Georgia
Bout right:
Ohio St
Bama
TCU
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:29 pm to Choctaw
UGA should be more in the 10-15 range imo
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:29 pm to Choctaw
LSU @ 5?
Oregon @ 7 is too low
Oregon @ 7 is too low
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:32 pm to Choctaw
The real rankings won't be anywhere close to this, but I'm sure its making the big 12 meltdown which is fun.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:34 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Great offensive line? Check.
5th year senior QB with 2 seasons of starting experience under his belt? Check.
At least 2 future NFL running backs? Check.
One of the top TE's in the country? Check.
Playmakers at WR? Check.
Schedule sets up well? Check (it's tough, but as far as how it's setup it's perfect).
Defense good enough to keep team in every game? Check.
Team is hungry? Bert.
2 Conference Wins in the last 2 years, Check
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:36 pm to Choctaw
Auburn back to underdog status=SEC fricked
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:37 pm to Choctaw
Last year's preseason FPI for comparison:
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:37 pm to Tackle74
quote:
2 Conference Wins in the last 2 years, Check
by this logic the 2013 auburn football team should've been terrible
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:39 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
But, but ESPN hates LSU
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:39 pm to Choctaw
No AU
@ A&M and Ole Miss
LSU should be 9-10
@ A&M and Ole Miss
LSU should be 9-10
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:43 pm to lsusteve1
My issue is that people at ESPN put #'s into this model, see what it spits out and say "this is our top 10 FPI"
What should be done is see what the result is, and go back to their model to determine if it is working correctly
I just can't see this model being valid
What should be done is see what the result is, and go back to their model to determine if it is working correctly
I just can't see this model being valid
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:43 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
by this logic the 2013 auburn football team should've been terrible
So you guys got an entirely new coaching staff?
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:44 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Johnny Football ain't walking through that door TeLeFaWx!!!!
This should be his senior year.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:45 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Great offensive line? Check.
Yes
quote:
5th year senior QB with 2 seasons of starting experience under his belt? Check.
Not bad to have I agree but Allen isn't a world beater.
quote:
At least 2 future NFL running backs? Check.
Yes
quote:
One of the top TE's in the country? Check.
Eh. He's decent
quote:
Playmakers at WR? Check.
Literally know none of your receiver's names
quote:
Schedule sets up well? Check (it's tough, but as far as how it's setup it's perfect).
How so?
quote:
Defense good enough to keep team in every game? Check.
They need to be able to force more turnovers like they did against Ole Miss last year.
quote:
Team is hungry? Bert.
Truer words have never been spoken.
I don't think y'all are top 10 but you're right there with us in the 15-20 range.
This post was edited on 7/21/15 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 7/21/15 at 1:46 pm to Tackle74
quote:
2 Conference Wins in the last 2 years, Check
Looking at the past while keeping your back to the future essentially makes you blind.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News