Started By
Message
re: ESPN Positional Weighted Averages Combined Overall Rankings
Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:56 pm to Ericvol2096
Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:56 pm to Ericvol2096
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/11/15 at 10:39 am
0
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:00 pm to Ericvol2096
OK for our OL and DL weighted folks here it is.
OL and DL got x2 and QB x1.5 and rest 1.
SO FAR
1 - Auburn - 78.5
2 - Tennessee - 75.5
3 - Bama - 73.5
4 - Georgia - 71
5 - LSU - 66.5
6 - Ark - 65
7 - A&M - 64
8 - Miss St - 62
9 - Missouri - 58
10 - Ole Miss - 53.5
11 - Florida - 46
12 - South Carolina - 38
13 - Kentucky - 27.5
14 - Vandy - 8.5
OL and DL got x2 and QB x1.5 and rest 1.
SO FAR
1 - Auburn - 78.5
2 - Tennessee - 75.5
3 - Bama - 73.5
4 - Georgia - 71
5 - LSU - 66.5
6 - Ark - 65
7 - A&M - 64
8 - Miss St - 62
9 - Missouri - 58
10 - Ole Miss - 53.5
11 - Florida - 46
12 - South Carolina - 38
13 - Kentucky - 27.5
14 - Vandy - 8.5
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:02 pm to PokerPlayingTiger
quote:
How about you just give equal weight to all positions and not put your spin on ESPN's rankings?
Because when I posted them straight up last night everyone bitched that it was not valid because I valued OL and QB the same as RB.
TN was #1 with Auburn without any weights as well.
IT hasn't changed anything much.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:04 pm to Ericvol2096
My version:
I weighted the offense roughly by NFL salaries of starters.
QB(1)- 23%
RB/FB(1)- 11%
WR/TE(4)- 28%
OL(5)- 38%
OFFENSE
#1 Auburn
#2 Texas A&M
#3 Georgia
#4 Arkansas
#5 LSU
#6 Tennessee
#7 Miss State
#8 Alabama
#9 Missouri
#10 Ole Miss
#11 S Carolina
#12 Florida
#13 Kentucky
#14 Vanderbilt
I also ranked the schools usin CBS' 2016-2018 NFL projection. HERE (Tennessee is ranked 3rd here)
I weighted the offense roughly by NFL salaries of starters.
QB(1)- 23%
RB/FB(1)- 11%
WR/TE(4)- 28%
OL(5)- 38%
OFFENSE
#1 Auburn
#2 Texas A&M
#3 Georgia
#4 Arkansas
#5 LSU
#6 Tennessee
#7 Miss State
#8 Alabama
#9 Missouri
#10 Ole Miss
#11 S Carolina
#12 Florida
#13 Kentucky
#14 Vanderbilt
I also ranked the schools usin CBS' 2016-2018 NFL projection. HERE (Tennessee is ranked 3rd here)
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:05 pm to Ericvol2096
You're wasting your time doing this here. No matter how you do it, someone will bitch about it not being fair. It seems some in here have a problem grasping what "so far" means. I'm sure it is impossible to some that Tennessee is actually talented again.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:05 pm to BornKjun
Cool, nice work and interesting thought to use NFL salaries.
Not sure many here will think WR should be weighted higher than QB though.
Not sure many here will think WR should be weighted higher than QB though.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:09 pm to Ericvol2096
quote:
Not sure many here will think WR should be weighted higher than QB though.
Easy. There are 2-4 WRs and 0-2 TEs on the field at one time. Only 1 QB. QB is given the highest weight per player, WRs are higher simply because there are more of them.
Also, if a QB only has one good WR, teams will double that guy and man-up on everyone else. WR depth contributes to a QB's production.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:10 pm to Ericvol2096
quote:
Ericvol2096
Get a hobby, some pussy, or both.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:10 pm to BornKjun
Hmmm this is a really good thought as well.
Cool, thanks for doing that, will you update it as ESPN does the rest of their rankings?
Cool, thanks for doing that, will you update it as ESPN does the rest of their rankings?
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:12 pm to toosleaux
Have a great job, a lovely wife, a beautiful young daughter, live in the most beautiful city in the world, golf 3 or 4 days a week, hit the beach once a week, fish a few times a month and go out to the best restaurant and bar scene in America frequently.
I'm good.
I'm good.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:12 pm to Ericvol2096
That logic sounds really good to me. Dobbs could absolutely make a bad OL look good, with his elusiveness in the same way that Ramsey could make our OL look below average if they hold onto the ball too long.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 2:30 pm to Ericvol2096
Print the t-shirts. It's a done deal. Congrats on the Championship. Hope we can do better in '16.
Posted on 2/27/15 at 7:40 pm to LoyalTiger
Bump
Posted on 2/27/15 at 7:41 pm to Ericvol2096
VOLS/Plainsmen ATL battle incoming
Posted on 2/27/15 at 9:21 pm to PokerPlayingTiger
quote:
How about you just give equal weight to all positions and not put your spin on ESPN's rankings?
Because not all positions are equally important you buffoon.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 10:35 am to BigOrangeBri
Updated first post with the LB rankings included that were released today. DB's coming tomorrow then ST's...possibly coaches as well.
QB Emphasized Formula total points
1 - Tennessee - 84
1 - Auburn - 84
3 - Alabama - 77
4 - Georgia - 74.5
5 - Missouri- 71.5
6 - Miss St - 70
7 - LSU - 68.5
8 - Arkansas - 63.5
9 - Texas A&M - 63
10 - Ole Miss - 48
11 - Florida - 47
12 - South Carolina - 39
13 - Kentucky - 34
14 - Vandy - 16
OL/DL Emphasized Formula total points
1 - Auburn - 89.5
2 - Alabama - 86.5
3 - Tennessee - 85.5
4 - Georgia - 85
5 - LSU- 75.5
6 - Missouri - 70
7 - Miss St - 68
7 - Arkansas - 68
9 - Texas A&M - 65
10 - Ole Miss - 55.5
11 - Florida - 51
12 - South Carolina - 45
13 - Kentucky - 31.5
14 - Vandy - 16.5
QB Emphasized Formula total points
1 - Tennessee - 84
1 - Auburn - 84
3 - Alabama - 77
4 - Georgia - 74.5
5 - Missouri- 71.5
6 - Miss St - 70
7 - LSU - 68.5
8 - Arkansas - 63.5
9 - Texas A&M - 63
10 - Ole Miss - 48
11 - Florida - 47
12 - South Carolina - 39
13 - Kentucky - 34
14 - Vandy - 16
OL/DL Emphasized Formula total points
1 - Auburn - 89.5
2 - Alabama - 86.5
3 - Tennessee - 85.5
4 - Georgia - 85
5 - LSU- 75.5
6 - Missouri - 70
7 - Miss St - 68
7 - Arkansas - 68
9 - Texas A&M - 65
10 - Ole Miss - 55.5
11 - Florida - 51
12 - South Carolina - 45
13 - Kentucky - 31.5
14 - Vandy - 16.5
Posted on 3/2/15 at 11:23 am to Ericvol2096
quote:
6 - Miss St - 70
How can we be this high? The rantards say we lost evvvverything. I also thought Ole Miss was loaded, but they only have one experienced returning LB?
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 11:26 am
Posted on 3/2/15 at 11:25 am to Ericvol2096
This is a much better thread than the stuff some of you post on here.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 11:30 am to Ericvol2096
The biggest flaw in this ranking is you are assuming the dropoff from first to last ranking is the same across the board at every position. I sincerely doubt that is the case, and on the field that will make a huge difference.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 11:39 am to SoGaFan
quote:
The biggest flaw in this ranking is you are assuming the dropoff from first to last ranking is the same across the board at every position. I sincerely doubt that is the case, and on the field that will make a huge difference.
Damnit, that is a good point. Oh well I am going to continue with this cause it's all I have at this point. haha!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News