Started By
Message
re: ESPN: Do you believe Tennessee is back?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:05 pm to Serraneaux
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:05 pm to Serraneaux
Dooley just needed another season. He had them on the right track.
0
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:05 pm to LSUNV
You are arguing with a window licker.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:05 pm to LSUNV
I still like to know how you came up with 9 sec titles in the last 47 years? Bama math?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:06 pm to Serraneaux
Is comprehending a word an act or a suggestion
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:06 pm to LSUNV
Are those in the last 47 years ? I think not.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:11 pm to LSUNV
quote:
3 SIAA
I'm pretty sure neither the SIAA or SoCon (prior to 1933) recognized "official" champions, though schools claim championships from the old days.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:13 pm to cyde
Not yet back....setting calendar to 2016.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:14 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
Is the siaa considered an sec title you dmbshite?
Well, considering the SIAA included virtually all of the charter SEC schools (even including Sewanee, Georgia Tech and Tulane), it wouldn't be unreasonable to include them.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:15 pm to Serraneaux
I can cherry pick too, LSU Has 4 SEC Championships since SEC championship Game was started how many Does UT have.
Last 22 years is more relevant than last 100, LSU has 2 the last decade
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:15 pm to cyde
Yes it would.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:18 pm to Phat Phil
The team that beat Arkansas State by 15 is going to win 10 games.....
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:19 pm to LSUNV
You started the cherry picking with your 45 year reply which was wrong anyway (still want to know how you came up with 9) brought up siaa titles and other titles outside of your cherry picked year range. Get your shite together and come back in the morning.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:19 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
Yes it would.
No it wouldn't.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:21 pm to cyde
Two different entities completely but let's count them as SEC titles. Sounds logical.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:23 pm to Serraneaux
No, I wasn't cherry picking when I read your dumbass comment, you did when you pulled 47 years out your arse and mentioning the SIAA titles was just to say UT had us beat overall, so no it was not the same
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:23 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
Two different entities completely but let's count them as SEC titles. Sounds logical.
13 of the 14 current SEC schools were in the SIAA. To invalidate SIAA wins as being de facto SEC wins due to it being "a different entity" or having a different name is intellectually dishonest. Everyone who has ever been anyone in the SEC was present and accounted for.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:23 pm to cyde
We'll just start calling all of the old soviet bloc countries Russians. I'm sure east Germans will understand.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:24 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
We'll just start calling all of the old soviet bloc countries Russians. I'm sure east Germans will understand.
Poor analogy.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:25 pm to Serraneaux
Cyde admitted the siaa didn't officially recognize titles back in the day and now thinks it is logical to count those titles as sec titles. 
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:26 pm to Serraneaux
Well since you a frick ton of them, sit back and STFU
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News