Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry Destroying Motherfrickers...............
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:25 pm to ULQQKED
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:25 pm to ULQQKED
lol, what does that have to do with what we're talking about?? and new money? check the s/n. we have a winning record vs yall since before 1950
and you were the one who said his talent would just waste away for the shitty chiefs. i just don't think it will be much different than how he spent his time at tenn
eta: we have yall beat overall
and you were the one who said his talent would just waste away for the shitty chiefs. i just don't think it will be much different than how he spent his time at tenn
eta: we have yall beat overall
This post was edited on 8/28/10 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:28 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:29 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
UFownstSECsince1950
Sorry with that one you are no longer worth the effort.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:30 pm to ULQQKED
yeah, i just realized that and made an ETA. i got yall and uga confused for a second.
so, how again are we "new money" ??
so, how again are we "new money" ??
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:31 pm to ULQQKED
Still UF didn't beat UT before 1950.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:31 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
so, how again are we "new money" ??
You just proved it.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:31 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
we have a winning record vs yall since before 1950
quote:
eta: we have yall beat overall
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:34 pm to ULQQKED
quote:
Still UF didn't beat UT before 1950.
well, we only played 10 times before 1954
and we have managed to compile a 20-9 record since then
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:35 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
well, we only played 10 times before 1954
and we have managed to compile a 20-9 record since then
This is supposed to disprove the notion that you're new money?
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:35 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
well, we only played 10 times before 1954
and we have managed to compile a 20-9 record since then
So you agree your team is new money, thanks.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:36 pm to volfan30
so you were watching uf/tenn games in the 1930's?? i guess anything after WWII is "new money"
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:37 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
I'm sure we can work something out.. How about, your posters stop posting a thread everytime Saban does something as monumental as taking a shite? I'm sure the VOL posters will follow their end of the agreement
But you see Saban is still in the SEC. So the state of his bowels as pertains to their regularity is of vital importance to the SEC community.
Eric Berry is gone. No one gives a shite.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:37 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
uf/tenn games in the 1930's??
Until 1950 as you claimed UT still won. Nothing wrong with knowing your teams history unless you are new to the show.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:39 pm to ULQQKED
we own the overall series record vs yall
we have a 20-9 record since 1954 vs yall
i guess i'll take "new money" all day every day
we have a 20-9 record since 1954 vs yall
i guess i'll take "new money" all day every day
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:40 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
we own the overall series record vs yall
When did UF acquire that title?
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:41 pm to ULQQKED
quote:
When did UF acquire that title?
whenever we acquired the "new money" title
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:41 pm to ULQQKED
The new money tag pisses off UF fans like nothing else, the truth hurts like it should.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:42 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
whenever we acquired the "new money" title
So it was very recently!
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:44 pm to volfan30
quote:
Berry had a much better career, numbers and awards wise, than Landry. Landry also had a far superior front 7. Landry was very good, but on Berry's level.
Career Stats
Berry - 241 tackles, 18 tfl, 3 sacks, 14 ints (3 TDs), 17 passes defended, 2 fumbles forced, 4 fumbles recovered, 0 blocked kicks
Landry - 315 tackles, 16 tfl, 8 sacks, 12 ints, 40 passes defended, 2 fumbles forced, 0 fumbles recovered, 2 blocked kicks
Berry did get a lot more national attention than Landry, and won a lot more national awards. But remember, Landry got the big award in 2003 with the BCS National Championship. LaRon was a true freshman starter and the leading tackler on that defense. And Landry did bring in these awards:
2006 First-Team All-American (AP, AFCA)
2006 Second-Team All-American (Walter Camp, SI.com, Rivals.com)
2006 First Team All-SEC (AP, SEC Coaches)
2006 Thorpe Award Semifinalist
2005 Third-Team All-American (AP)
2005 First-Team All-SEC (SEC Coaches)
2005 Second-Team All-SEC (AP)
2004 Second-Team All-SEC (SEC Coaches)
2003 First-Team Freshman All-American (Football Writer’s Association, Collegefootballnews.com)
2003 Second-Team All-SEC (AP)
2003 Freshman All-SEC (SEC Coaches, Knoxville News-Sentinel, The Sporting News)
Landry was the #6 overall pick in 2007. Berry the #5 overall pick in 2010. Their combine numbers were really similar. LaRon ran a 4.35 to Berry's 4.47. Berry had an insane VJ at 43 inches. LaRon jumped 38 inches.
I'm just saying these are the 2 best safeties I have seen play in the SEC. I'm not saying one is better than the other. But for you to say Landry isn't on Berry's level is kind of a slap in the face, so I gotta make a case for Landry. The one thing Berry was great at was scoring and picking up huge yards on his interception returns. He was superior to Landry in that area, but as you look at all the phases of the game, it starts to even out. And again, Landry was the leading tackler on the 2003 National Championship team as a true freshman. Thats got to count for a lot.
Posted on 8/28/10 at 8:44 pm to ULQQKED
quote:
very recently!
Real surprise that these two words are used to describe Florida football, or not....
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News