Started By
Message

re: Does Auburn finish dead last in the SEC West?

Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33329 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:41 pm to
If you're actually interested:

LINK

Auburn has had an enrollment of under 4,000 until '86
Posted by Jamie Lannister
Member since Jun 2015
2143 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

That's a random factor to use as a means of being SEC worthy


what does SEC worthy even mean. lol nobody is applying to the SEC. my point is Clemson has competed with and won games against SEC in modern era including last 2 against Auburn.
Posted by Jamie Lannister
Member since Jun 2015
2143 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

If you're actually interested: LINK Auburn has had an enrollment of under 4,000 until '86


ok I will corroborate this with another website because I'm certain they were a good bit bigger.

why do you think Auburn was such a power despite being in a poor rural area? how could they recruit but not Clemson back then, given the similiarities.
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 2:44 pm
Posted by AA7
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2009
26692 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:44 pm to
My mistake. Scanned too quickly through the thread. Thought you used that in the same post about rolling with the SEC.
Posted by PharmacistReb
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2009
5058 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:44 pm to
LSU loses out. 1-10.
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33329 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

ok I will corroborate this with another website because I'm certain they were a good bit bigger.


Corroborate all you want but the university wouldn't grossly underreport enrollment figures

quote:

why do you think Auburn was such a power despite being in a poor rural area?


Auburn has always put an emphasis on football. Poor folks in Alabama have always supported local universities throughout any tough economic downturn. It's part of the culture in the state
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105403 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:50 pm to
Having a discussion with Lannister is like trying to have a discussion with a 6 year old only worse.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

ok I will corroborate this with another website because I'm certain they were a good bit bigger.
No, you assumed they were as a fallback of why Auburn owns Clemson in football without doing any research.

So.... par for the course for you.
Posted by jsmoove
Member since Oct 2010
12627 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I think your stats may be wrong.



Says the tool that claimed Clemson dominated and Bolin had way less yards than Watson.
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25661 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Auburn has had an enrollment of under 4,000 until '86


Uh...did I miss something?? Your link says AU had 19,363 in the '86/'87 school year...
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63929 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:18 pm to
Clemson has won their last two over Au.

And they are 1/2 in their last two over UGA.

They beat usc last year.
Posted by thirdlawson
Nashville
Member since Oct 2011
8619 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Auburn appears to be imploding as a program, a clear downtrend has been happening.



quote:

Jamie Lannister



Oh yeah?? SHUT UP!!

Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30871 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Does Auburn finish dead last in the SEC West?


Dead heat for last place between them and Arkansas.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73476 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:50 pm to
Arky will save them.
Posted by Uncle Luke
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
439 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 3:57 pm to
Arkansas will finish dead last, with Auburn and Texas A&M nipping at their heels.
Posted by Jamie Lannister
Member since Jun 2015
2143 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 4:08 pm to
Clemson in 1965 had 5,024 students.
Auburn had 10,785 students.

You got confused b/c the table has a bold line in the wrong place.

In 1940s, Clemson was in 3000 range, Auburn was in 7000 range.

1940's is when Auburn took off in enrollment, and appear to be 5000 or more students than Clemson from then on.
This post was edited on 9/18/15 at 4:11 pm
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33329 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 4:11 pm to
You're right. I was reading my chart backwards. I blame it on being Asian and you can't make fun of me because that's racist.
Posted by Jamie Lannister
Member since Jun 2015
2143 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

ou're right. I was reading my chart backwards. I blame it on being Asian and you can't make fun of me because that's racist.


i am now prepared to accept your apology for doubting my memory.
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
33329 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

i am now prepared to accept your apology


Posted by tjv305
Member since May 2015
12511 posts
Posted on 9/18/15 at 4:24 pm to
Right now I would say no. MSU and Arkansas are just as likely.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter