Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/1/12 at 2:14 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
I think Stanford's loss to UW hurts them more than anything. LSU spanked UW.
Posted on 12/1/12 at 4:50 am to TideSaint
I think the hypothetical you're talking about is contingent on Stanford not losing to Washington. In that case you'd have a 12-1 Stanford team, Pac-12 champs, having knocked off Oregon and now twice UCLA, with the only loss being essentially hosed by the refs vs undefeated #1 Notre Dame.
It's not that crazy an argument, but it's based on a hypothetical that didn't happen. No, a 2-loss Stanford team should not go over a 1-loss Alabama or Georgia team.
It's not that crazy an argument, but it's based on a hypothetical that didn't happen. No, a 2-loss Stanford team should not go over a 1-loss Alabama or Georgia team.
Posted on 12/1/12 at 7:39 am to TideSaint
quote:
Do some of you actually think Stanford deserves a shot over the SEC champ?
I've seen NO ONE say that
typical Gump Bull shhit
but if there were a 4 team playoff, they deserve to go before Oregon but wouldn't
which will happen again and is a point of reference right NOW that the "new" system will be just as flawed
Posted on 12/1/12 at 7:54 am to stapuffmarshy
Stanford - Notre Dame matchup makes sense if you want to add the criterion - best student athletes.
Posted on 12/1/12 at 7:59 am to TideSaint
Uh, no. 
Posted on 12/1/12 at 8:26 am to SanDiegeauxSteve
PAC-12 CG ATTENDANCE: 31,622
That is how many people actually care about the Pac-12, UCLA, or Stanford. I bet Miami is THRILLED to not be hosting you. ND and SEC fans of ANY school will show up in droves.
The SECCG attendance is estimated at over 75,000
That is how many people actually care about the Pac-12, UCLA, or Stanford. I bet Miami is THRILLED to not be hosting you. ND and SEC fans of ANY school will show up in droves.
The SECCG attendance is estimated at over 75,000
This post was edited on 12/2/12 at 8:50 am
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News