Started By
Message
re: Do not throw stones when you live in a glass house
Posted on 6/16/17 at 5:23 am to TOFTR
Posted on 6/16/17 at 5:23 am to TOFTR
LOL. Nowhere in that article does it say he was offered that shite by LSU, it actually says that he got BENCHED by johnny jones for not going to class as much as he should have (that's compliance), even though everyone knew he was only going to be at LSU for a year. Did you even listen to the soundbyte for the article you posted? No. It is more likely he got offered all that shite by agents trying to snag the top draft pick for the following draft...just like when shaq was kidding around and said something about getting paid by LSU to play there and people blew that out of proportion and he later said it was simply a joke. We had the lester earl situation, the top player in america from baton rouge glen oaks hs for basketball, even though ended up going to kansas in the end. We got put on probation fired those responible for the
Violations, and did our time and served our penalty in basketball for almost a decade. Will Ole Miss take their lick in football like that? Yall had coaches giving players money, and boosters, among lots of other level 1 violations. Now, you know as well as I know that there are different boosters that give for different sports. We are talking about football dude, and all you can argue is how an LSU player allegedly got offered things while playing BASKETBALL at LSU? It doesn't even say who offered it to him...prob an agent everytime. Now, back to FOOTBALL, LSU is and has always been the cleanest program in the SEC west and in the top 3 for sure in the conference, thats not up for debate...that's fact. Care to try and find some dirt on LSU football? You probably did and google came back with nothing lol. Keep on trying. Cheaters.
Violations, and did our time and served our penalty in basketball for almost a decade. Will Ole Miss take their lick in football like that? Yall had coaches giving players money, and boosters, among lots of other level 1 violations. Now, you know as well as I know that there are different boosters that give for different sports. We are talking about football dude, and all you can argue is how an LSU player allegedly got offered things while playing BASKETBALL at LSU? It doesn't even say who offered it to him...prob an agent everytime. Now, back to FOOTBALL, LSU is and has always been the cleanest program in the SEC west and in the top 3 for sure in the conference, thats not up for debate...that's fact. Care to try and find some dirt on LSU football? You probably did and google came back with nothing lol. Keep on trying. Cheaters.
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 5:49 am
0
Posted on 6/16/17 at 6:49 am to Left Handed Catcher
Auburn survived the NCAA probe of probes with the cam Newton bullshite.
Ole miss is fricked.
Sorry.
Ole miss is fricked.
Sorry.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 6:58 am to Left Handed Catcher
quote:
Do not throw stones when you live in a glass house
Make me.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:02 am to Left Handed Catcher
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:06 am to ImayGoLesMiles
quote:
LSU is the cleanest program in the sec west historically, by far, it's not close
Well that is wrong. Here are the major violations for SEC West Football programs
LSU 2
OM 3
Arky 2
a&M 4
State 4
Bama 5
Auburn 5
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:09 am to Left Handed Catcher
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:22 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Well that is wrong. Here are the major violations for SEC West Football programs
Depends on how you look at it. LSU has had a total of 2 seasons on probation. The next closest is Arkansas with 4 seasons. Ole Miss has had 7 seasons on probation, along with State. A&M has had 9, while Alabama has has 10 and Auburn 11.
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 7:41 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:44 am to Left Handed Catcher
quote:
According to Hal Mumme he has reported LSU and the NCAA is about to take a visit to Stink City
Do you know how much of a dumbass you are for even typing this statement out?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:46 am to tigerinridgeland
quote:
Depends on how you look at it. LSU has had a total of 2 seasons on probation. The next closest is Arkansas with 4 seasons. Ole Miss has had 7 seasons on probation, along with State. A&M has had 9, while Alabama has has 10 and Auburn 11.
Your numbers are wrong. OM has 3.
ETA. Auburn's number is wrong on the NCAA website as well, FWIW. So not sure how accurate the numbers actually are as far as the the counter area on the NCAA site
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 7:48 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 7:59 am to ImayGoLesMiles
quote:
LSU is the cleanest program in the sec west historically, by far, it's not close.
Most recent program to be sanctioned by the NCAA. Just sayin
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:08 am to StopRobot
quote:
Most recent program to be sanctioned by the NCAA. Just sayin
Nah, state in the west is, UT and SC behind them
I have got to say I love the new NCAA site. I also saw bama got hit with a major in the recent assistant coach issue
going back to the birth of football
Apr 14, 2017 - University of Alabama
Feb 20, 2015 - University of Florida
Jun 07, 2013 - Mississippi State University
Nov 16, 2012 - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Apr 27, 2012 - University of South Carolina, Columbia
Jul 19, 2011 - Louisiana State University
Jun 11, 2009 - University of Alabama
Nov 16, 2005 - University of South Carolina, Columbia
Oct 27, 2004 - Mississippi State University
Apr 17, 2003 - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Feb 01, 2002 - University of Alabama
Jan 31, 2002 - University of Kentucky
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:10 am to Left Handed Catcher
Our house is made of a strong plexiglass. It creates a safer space.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:15 am to BreakawayZou83
quote:
Our house is made of a strong plexiglass. It creates a safer space.
Ours just has padded walls to absorb stone throws
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:24 am to Left Handed Catcher
quote:
For all the SEC West fans who are attempting to bring down Ole Miss have you ever wonder that Ole Miss might bring you down with them
Never gonna happen. NCAA does not care about the amount of cheating the other schools are doing. Ole Miss was going WAY above and beyond what other schools are doing.
quote:
According to Hal Mumme he has reported LSU and the NCAA is about to take a visit to Stink City
I bet they aren't other than to maybe congratulate Orgeron for keeping a shitty school out of his state.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:45 am to Left Handed Catcher
Whoa, Hal Mumme. 
Posted on 6/16/17 at 8:55 am to Left Handed Catcher
quote:
have you ever wonder that Ole Miss might bring you down with them
NO also, what if you're stuck in a glass house? You should then throw stones, correct? I mean, why stay stuck in a glass house when you can just throw your stone... food for thought
Posted on 6/16/17 at 9:00 am to NYCAuburn
What's the major with the assistant coach issue? Haven't heard about that.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 9:17 am to caliegeaux
quote:
What's the major with the assistant coach issue? Haven't heard about that.
quote:
In April 2015, the NCAA enforcement staff received information from confidential sources regarding potential violations in the institution's football program. On August 24, 2015, the enforcement staff issued a verbal notice of inquiry. From September 2015 to May 2016, the institution and the enforcement staff conducted a joint investigation. On April 27, 2016, the former assistant football coach resigned at the institution's request. In early October 2016, the representative of the institution's athletics interests (athletics representative) involved in this case submitted answers to written questions provided to her by the institution and enforcement staff in May 2016.3
The institution, a former assistant football coach (former assistant coach 1) and the
enforcement staff agree that between December 1, 2014, and May 21, 2015, former
assistant coach 1 violated NCAA recruiting legislation when he engaged in a prearranged,
impermissible off-campus contact at a high school in Houston, Texas (the high school)
with four football prospective student-athletes. It is further agreed that former assistant
coach 1 knew and/or should have known a representative of the institution's athletics
interests (the athletics representative) was assisting and/or participating in the recruitment
of the four prospects. Specifically:
a. Between December 1, 2014, and January 31, 2015, the athletics representative, who
was the mother of a then Alabama football student-athlete, contacted the head football
coach at the high school to arrange a meeting. Once the athletics representative arrived
at the high school, she asked to meet with four football prospective student-athletes
(prospects 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively). The athletics representative initially met with
the four prospects for approximately 10 to 15 minutes and former assistant coach 1
later joined the meeting for approximately 15 to 20 minutes. The impermissible contact
lasted a total of 25 to 35 minutes, occurred at least six months prior to the permissible
timeframe for an off-campus contact with prospect 3 and at least 18 months prior to the permissible time frame for off-campus contacts with prospects 1, 2 and 4. [Bylaws
13.01.2, 13.1.1.1 and 13.1.2.1 (2014-15" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">
b. Subsequently, on or about May 21, 2015, the athletics representative contacted the head
football coach at the high school to arrange a meeting with prospects 2, 3 and 4 to
follow up on the prior meeting with the prospects, as outlined in Violation No. 1-a. The
second impermissible contact lasted approximately 10 minutes. [Bylaws 13.01.2,
13.1.1.1 and 13.1.2.1 (2014-15" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">
2. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 10.01.1, 10.1 and 10.1-(d) (2015-16" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer"> (Level I)
The institution, former assistant coach 1 and the enforcement staff agree that between
September 23, 2015, and April 25, 2016, former assistant coach 1 violated the principles
of ethical conduct when he knowingly provided false or misleading information to the
enforcement staff and institution regarding his knowledge of a representative of the
institution's athletics interests assisting and/or participating in the recruitment of football
prospects and individual involvement in the impermissible off-campus recruiting contact
with four prospects. Specifically:
a. During his September 23, 2015, and April 25, 2016, interviews with the enforcement
staff and institution, former assistant coach 1 provided false or misleading information
when he denied knowledge of the athletics representative's involvement with and her
presence during former assistant coach 1's visit to the high school detailed in Violation
No. 1. In both interviews, former assistant coach 1 denied seeing the athletics
representative at the high school and denied that she had any involvement in his visit
outlined in Violation No. 1-a. Former assistant coach 1's statements are in direct
contradiction to information reported to the institution and enforcement staff by two
involved football prospects and the high school's head football coach, as well as some
of former assistant coach 1's own statements during his May 2, 2016, interview.
[Bylaws 10.01.1, 10.1 and 10.1-(d) (2015-16" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">
b. During his September 23, 2015, and April 25, 2016, interviews with the enforcement
staff and institution, former assistant coach 1 provided false or misleading information
when he denied having in-person, off-campus recruiting contact with four football
prospects at the high school as detailed in Violation No. 1-a. Specifically, former
assistant coach 1 denied seeing or interacting with any prospects at the high school.
Former assistant coach 1's statements are in direct contradiction to the information
reported to the institution and enforcement staff by two involved football prospects and
the high school's head football coach, as well as some of former assistant coach 1's own
statements during his May 2, 2016, interview.
3. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.02.5.2, 13.17.4.1 (2013-14); 13.01.2 (2013-14 and
2015-16); and 13.1.2.1 (2015-16" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer"> (Level III)
The institution and enforcement staff agree that between May 14, 2014, and December 9,
2015, members of the institution's football coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting
legislation on two occasions when they engaged in impermissible contacts and/or used an
impermissible recruiter during the recruitment of two football prospective student-athletes.
Specifically:
a. On May 14, 2014, a then assistant football coach (former assistant coach 2) had
impermissible off-campus contact during an evaluation period with a then football
prospective student-athlete (prospect 5) at prospect 5's Maryland high school.
Specifically, after conducting an evaluation of prospect 5, former assistant coach 2
engaged in a brief conversation with prospect 5. Further, former assistant coach 2
accompanied prospect 5 to his high school football head coach's office, where he
participated in three different photographs with prospect 5 in an effort to document
prospect 5's physical size. Former assistant coach 2's contacts with prospect 5 were
impermissible as they occurred outside of a permissible contact period and two months
prior to the permissible timeframe for an off-campus contact with prospect 5. [Bylaws
13.01.2, 13.02.5.2, 13.1.1.1, 13.17.4.1 (2013-14" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">
b. On or around December 9, 2015, members of the football coaching staff permitted an
impermissible recruiter to attend a home visit with a then prospective student-athlete
(prospect 6). Specifically, the institution arranged for prospect 6's youth football coach
to provide a member of the coaching staff with transportation from the airport to
prospect 6's home. The youth football coach then entered the home and was present
for the duration of the recruiting visit, although not an active participant
LINK
Posted on 6/16/17 at 9:25 am to NYCAuburn
Yeah, thats not even the tip of the iceberg. Ole miss is fish food.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 9:32 am to Left Handed Catcher
quote:
I know for sure Ole Miss has brought up State and Bama to the NCAA
Bro. First of all, Freeze is on record making some kind of veiled threat about remembering people who turned them in and said Bama wasn't one of them.
Second, Bama has like 7 straight #1 recruiting classes. You don't think Ole Miss would be the first team in that stretch to run to NCAA talking about "something's up" do you? Of course not. Yet nothing has been found in regards to major recruiting violations - and the one violation that was bad (impermissible visits) resulted in the firing of the coach who lied about it.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News