Started By
Message
3
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:39 pm to AU_251
Lol
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:43 pm to tomsellecksmustache
quote:
Mark Ritch has lost control of the national media..
I sure can't wait til this unoriginal, lazy, sloppy, and unfunny joke is old news for good.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:45 pm to RB10
quote:
Most of us noticed, and acknowledge, the overall decline by the line starting in 2012.
I still would have thought LSU would be it. You guys have had skrong DL's for quite awhile.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:51 pm to WG_Dawg
Congrats on your national title in spring game attendance.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:51 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
They were simply curious, "who will challenge the dawgs?" As it turns out there were 3 teams that were better than us...question answered!
Was Auburn one of them?
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:53 pm to AU_251
quote:
This year you'd be hard pressed to find a better front 7 than Auburn's.
Better than last years?
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:53 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:I actually didn't
did you not read their criteria?
. I read the title and saw the teams and assumed it was talking about teams for the 2016 season. Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:53 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
Congrats on your national title in spring game attendance.
Yep. We beat Auburn........again.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:58 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
Congrats on your national title in spring game attendance.
*SEC title
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:58 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Was Auburn one of them?
of course not. But swoop has dual allegiance so we need to avoid that topic.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:59 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Was Auburn one of them?
quote:
of course not. But swoop has dual allegiance so we need to avoid that topic.
That's right. I forgot.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 2:59 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
I read the title and saw the teams and assumed it was talking about teams for the 2016 season.
I can assure you we aren't going to be near the top of any "best DL" lists for 2016.
Maybe towards the top of DLs in the SEC...east.
Maybe.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 3:10 pm to WG_Dawg
NM
This post was edited on 4/18/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 3:14 pm to CapstoneGrad06
This could be the dumbest ranking methodology I have seen. So he is trying to determine who DLU is based on the past ten years, but he counts players that played at those schools before the last ten years. Richard Seymour? He played at GA at the turn of the century. Kyle Williams played at LSU prior to the last 10 years. So these two players whose Pro Bowls are giving them the edge did not even play during the last 10 years.
I think all of these rankings are stupid, but I always read them to see how stupid the ranking criteria typically are.
I think all of these rankings are stupid, but I always read them to see how stupid the ranking criteria typically are.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 3:23 pm to WG_Dawg
Very Serrantroll like thread.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 5:58 pm to roadGator
It really is.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:15 pm to roadGator
quote:
Very Serrantroll like thread.
Yet very reasonable for Florida fans to run around here claiming to be DBU, right?
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:19 pm to DawgsLife
Right
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:40 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Yet very reasonable for Florida fans to run around here claiming to be DBU, right?
Link?
Can I call our trolls trolls or no?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News