Started By
Message
re: Dirtiest plays of the 2014 season thus far.....
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:23 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:23 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
The Kentucky play against UF was a dude falling down on another dude, not dirty
0
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:24 pm to CNB
quote:
KSGamecock already called him on his bullshite. He added it on his own free will
i didin't know that.
ok I take back everything I said.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:26 pm to WG_Dawg
Plus, we both know Tennessee is the real Moral Victory U
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:26 pm to CNB
He's not bragging about winning tSECCG, he's bragging about simply making it to a game and then getting beat.
lol @ UGA and their moral victories
lol @ UGA and their moral victories
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:27 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Division titles are not moral victories dude. I would trade 4/5 with UGA for SECCG appearances in a second.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:28 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
He's not bragging about winning tSECCG, he's bragging about simply making it to a game
winning the east is an actual, real life accomplishment. It's kinda of a big deal, and one of the first goals all 14 teams have before the season.
Win division, win SEC, win natty. Pretty sure that's how it goes for everyone.
quote:
lol @ UGA and their moral victories
none needed when it comes to jacksonville, we've done plenty enough on the field as of late.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:31 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Win division, win SEC, win natty. Pretty sure that's how it goes for everyone.
'Bama begs to differ.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:31 pm to CNB
I guess if you're UGA, haven't won a NC in 30+ years, have a top5 recruiting class every single year, etc etc.......then yeah, let's celebrate being slightly less shitty than the rest of the shitty arse East.
"We made it out of the East by default cause everyone sucks, then get our asses whipped by whoever represents the West. Whooohooo"!!!!
Moral Victory U!!!!!!
"We made it out of the East by default cause everyone sucks, then get our asses whipped by whoever represents the West. Whooohooo"!!!!
Moral Victory U!!!!!!
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:31 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
'Bama begs to differ.
lulz
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:32 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
So you wouldn't trade UGA's last 4 years with Florida's 4 years?
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:32 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
"We made it out of the East by default cause everyone sucks, then get our asses whipped by whoever represents the West. Whooohooo"!!!!
Moral Victory U!!!!!!
beat florida, win division...moral victory?
Interesting.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:33 pm to CNB
quote:
So you wouldn't trade UGA's last 4 years with Florida's 4 years?
Here's an interesting question. Would you trade 2010-2013 SC for UGA.
In that scenario SC would have 2 division titles, UGA only one. But UGA would have the bragging rights above SC, the better overall record, the better SEC record, and the better SEC-E record.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:34 pm to theGarnetWay
I absolutely would. SECCG appearances don't come often around here. I wouldn't even hesitate.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:35 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Here's an interesting question. Would you trade 2010-2013 SC for UGA.
any SC fan in their right mind would.
quote:
UGA would have the bragging rights above SC, the better overall record, the better SEC record, and the better SEC-E record.
we've had that for 100+ years over you anyway, what's 4 more? On the other hand, you have only had 1 division title. Why wouldn't you take a few more?
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:38 pm to heartbreakTiger
the tiger rant was trying to orchestrate a lynch mob with torches to march across the river at Natchez and Vicksburg and demand the State of Mississippi turn Day over to themPosted on 10/5/14 at 6:38 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
we've had that for 100+ years over you anyway, what's 4 more? On the other hand, you have only had 1 division title. Why wouldn't you take a few more?
We wouldn't be taking a few more. In the scenario of reversed roles UGA would win 2010 and SC would win 2011 and 2012. We'd be taking one more. One more division title, not a conference title, and a lot less total wins.
Plus, you'll find there are many Gamecocks who find 4 wins over UGA something worth bragging about. Imagine if we had 2 division titles but Spurrier was only 2-8 vs the Dawgs?
This post was edited on 10/5/14 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:39 pm to WG_Dawg
Trae Elston is dirty as F. He was the one that deliberately twisted Marlon Brown's knee as he was tackling him on the play that tore his ACL his senior year,
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:44 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
In the scenario of reversed roles UGA would win 2010 and SC would win 2011 and 2012. We'd be taking one more. One more division title, not a conference title, and a lot less total wins.
Well if it's a true apples to apples comparison, in one of those years you would have almost played for a national title and finished ranked 4th in the country. That would undoubtedly be one of the 2 or 3 best years in yoru school history. You currently have 1 east title. You wouldn't accept doubling that number?
quote:
. Imagine if we had 2 division titles but Spurrier was only 2-8 vs the Dawgs?
why would it matter? His job wouldn't be in jeopardy, the series record isn't remotely close, so that number would be largely irrelevant.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:47 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
why would it matter? His job wouldn't be in jeopardy, the series record isn't remotely close, so that number would be largely irrelevant.
Sometimes yes. But the only reason Clemson fans aren't 100% happy with Dabo is because of our dominance over him. Losing to a rival over and over again matters in college football. Perhaps more than any other sport in the world, college or pro. UGA isn't our chief rival so the blow would be less blunt.. but after a while there is pressure to beat team X.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 6:50 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Losing to a rival over and over again matters in college football
whoa whoa whoa whoa WAIT A MINUTE. Your SC Board and pretty much every poster of your fanbase always says SC only has one rival, and it's clemson. You have no room for others, and UGA isn't your rival. So is UGA a rival or not?
eta: nvm I see the rest of yoru post. still...it wouldn't really matter. For the overall state of the SC football prpogram, don't you think winning 2 SEC east titles and finsihing 4th in one of those years would be better than beating UGA but not winnign anything?
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News