Started By
Message
re: Deal Missouri back to Big 12...add Oklahoma
Posted on 4/21/13 at 11:58 am to Ostrich
Posted on 4/21/13 at 11:58 am to Ostrich
quote:
Dear SEC Folk,
Please don't think this moron represents the entire Oklahoma fan base.
For me personally, I would rather be in the Big 10 first. But if we ever change conferences, it's gonna come down to which conference is willing to take our retarded step-brother along with us.
So, basically, it's Pac12 or bust(in hopes that the value of Texas and Ok can make it feasible to carry Ok State).
I just don't understand tying the two schools together how it's been done -- which limits the options of either and prevents OK from ever getting the SEC invite where they rightfully belong culturally.
2
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:00 pm to aTm's conference now
quote:
Now TeLeFaWx clearly has a different opinion of how things went with this as his signature "Texas A&M - 1997, 1998, 2010, 2012 Big 12 Champs*"
FaWx all up in that sippy dome, huh?
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:01 pm to MSfootball123
frick OU, worst fans on the planet, make Bama fans seem sane and reasonable.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:03 pm to engie
quote:
I just don't understand tying the two schools together how it's been done -- which limits the options of either and prevents OK from ever getting the SEC invite where they rightfully belong culturally.
They don't belong culturally. And if you knew anything about Oklahoma, or the people there, you would know why they will never leave Oklahoma State behind. They politics in that state would absolutely never allow it. And tying them doesn't limit the options of either. It simply limits the options of Oklahoma. It is a life line to Oklahoma State that they desperately need, and will continue to have.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:07 pm to MSfootball123
No and no. We shouldn't be kicking people out. Let's just add Virginia[/Virginia Tech] and North Carolina and be done.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:10 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
They don't belong culturally
Sure don't.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 12:11 pm to engie
Engie, until Boone Pickens dies or his assets are liquidated, Okie Lite is stuck to Oklahoma
Posted on 4/21/13 at 1:55 pm to TbirdSpur2010
It's always the Aggies who are the most opposed to having OU join the SEC. Because you all know that of we joined, y'all would be fricked.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 2:30 pm to MSfootball123
LoL
And coming from an Ole Miss fan, to boot.
And coming from an Ole Miss fan, to boot.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 2:32 pm to Ostrich
quote:
It's always the Aggies who are the most opposed to having OU join the SEC. Because you all know that of we joined, y'all would be fricked.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 2:45 pm to TeLeFaWx
Difference between an OU fan and an A&M fan:
A&M celebrates mediocrity, while OU celebrates championships.
You won the Cotton Bowl against us after finishing third in your division, congrats!
One games doesn't make your program better than ours, you've got a long, long way to go.
A&M celebrates mediocrity, while OU celebrates championships.
You won the Cotton Bowl against us after finishing third in your division, congrats!
One games doesn't make your program better than ours, you've got a long, long way to go.
This post was edited on 4/21/13 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 4/21/13 at 3:08 pm to Ostrich
The Big 12 defines mediocrity, if even that, and your example demonstrates that. A team that finished 3rd in their division and 5th or 6th in the SEC absolutely kicked OU's arse on the field and OU finished what? Second in the Big 12?
Posted on 4/21/13 at 3:28 pm to reedus23
quote:
The Big 12 defines mediocrity
I don't disagree. I'm not arguing about how much the Big 12 sucks.
I'm simply calling out Aggies for acting as if they are all of a sudden above Oklahoma, when in reality, they never will be on the same level in our lifetime.
OU would bring a tradition of winning to the SEC that can only be matched by Alabama.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 3:38 pm to Ostrich
quote:
Ostrich
I'm gonna assume you're a dallas cowboys fan
how fricking sad would you find it if a Steelers fan talked shite about winning 6 super bowls?
same thing applies here. a&ms better than you right now
deal with it
Posted on 4/21/13 at 3:40 pm to NaturalLight00
quote:
I'm gonna assume you're a dallas cowboys fan
I'm not.
quote:
how fricking sad would you find it if a Steelers fan talked shite about winning 6 super bowls?
The Steelers are the best franchise in the NFL. (Not a Steelers fan either) You're point is retarded.
quote:
same thing applies here. a&ms better than you right now
Lol ok
quote:
Missouri Fan
My condolences
This post was edited on 4/21/13 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 4/21/13 at 4:30 pm to MSfootball123
Thankfully, the SEC has a very bright mind at the helm. Slive, along with the school administrators are making decisions with their priorities in order; and geography was not a primary factor.
What I really find amusing is the number of posters on this site that really expect one to believe they wanted a new member who would threaten their status quo. OU would not be a threat, but it is also extremely unlikely the machine would wish to part from its status quo.
The plan was to deliver a new market of willing administers and fans.. Mission Accomplished!
What I really find amusing is the number of posters on this site that really expect one to believe they wanted a new member who would threaten their status quo. OU would not be a threat, but it is also extremely unlikely the machine would wish to part from its status quo.
The plan was to deliver a new market of willing administers and fans.. Mission Accomplished!
Posted on 4/21/13 at 4:32 pm to Ostrich
quote:
It's always the Aggies who are the most opposed to having OU join the SEC. Because you all know that of we joined, y'all would be fricked.
Just as it was Mobilehoma who took the biggest hit to its recruiting when we joined the SEC.
For the first time in forever, OU had to settle for one of OUR scraps (no way we let you take Huggins if he had a prayer of qualifying).
Posted on 4/21/13 at 4:36 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Based on Rivals, you finished 4 spots higher than us at 11 while we were at 15. And y'all signed 100 players. I'm not worried.
Honestly, if you look at 2013 rankings, and rankings of past years, it's pretty clear Texas took the biggest hit.
Honestly, if you look at 2013 rankings, and rankings of past years, it's pretty clear Texas took the biggest hit.
This post was edited on 4/21/13 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 4/21/13 at 4:38 pm to Ostrich
quote:
And y'all signed 100 players.
After only signing 19 the year before.
Will still end up at 81 scholarship players. (82 if Stewart isn't a top ten pick next month)
Also, rivals is the LEAST reliable of all of the recruiting sites.
If you use the 247 rankings: A&M was 8th (1 5 star, 17 4 stars) and Oklahoma was 13th (10 4-stars)
This post was edited on 4/21/13 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 4/21/13 at 4:40 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Okay, I'm just saying signing more players helps you're recruiting ranking
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News