Started By
Message
re: Congrats on the win last night, Bengals, but I really do have a question...
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:06 pm to FearlessFreep
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:06 pm to FearlessFreep
The answer is 6 LSU wins in the last 7.
35-21.
But you still have a shot at 5th in the West.
35-21.
But you still have a shot at 5th in the West.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:06 pm to FearlessFreep
Wow. Desperate I see.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:08 pm to Grasshopper
I wonder if Mr Freep looked at the scoreboard when the clock went to triple zeroes.
The Barn didn't get it done. Actually played LSU closer last year with less talent.
Another long year for the Boogs.
The Barn didn't get it done. Actually played LSU closer last year with less talent.
Another long year for the Boogs.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:09 pm to FearlessFreep
My question is, how did you manage not to win a single game at Tiger stadium in this millienuem?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:11 pm to FearlessFreep
"You understand" from WHO. ??????
The announcers? ESPN? Press conference
questions after? The Archbishop of
Lichtenstein ?
'Pulling the starters' doesn't mean ALL11 at
One time. The backups/reserves actually
Played some in the first half, as some have
Started games in the past. Miles and
Chief rotate SOME players, not AAAALLLLL
on defense.
Sour grapes much ?????
The announcers? ESPN? Press conference
questions after? The Archbishop of
Lichtenstein ?
'Pulling the starters' doesn't mean ALL11 at
One time. The backups/reserves actually
Played some in the first half, as some have
Started games in the past. Miles and
Chief rotate SOME players, not AAAALLLLL
on defense.
Sour grapes much ?????
This post was edited on 9/22/13 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:11 pm to Charter n Coke
Perhaps you're right - I always assumed "pulling your starters" meant that you were far enough ahead that you let them sit out the rest of the game. Guess I got impression from our games last year against TAMU, UGa and Bama,
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:31 pm to FearlessFreep
Dude are you seriously on here flaming LSU fans because LSU won by 14? Once LSU went up 14 Auburn never got any closer than that. Not sure when the second touchdown came but lets say it came ten minutes in for arguments sake. Auburn spent at least 50 minutes of football down 14 or more. Great effort.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:39 pm to FearlessFreep
We took our foot of the gas....be thankful
We need a killer instinct and our D must get better
Despite this, you still lost
We need a killer instinct and our D must get better
Despite this, you still lost
Posted on 9/22/13 at 8:10 pm to lsusteve1
the answer is facile. lsu is in decline, overrated and every lsu win is a mirage because the other team just made too many unforced errors.
at least that's been the case since 2005.
at least that's been the case since 2005.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 9:34 pm to DamnStrong1860
I'm not flaming LSU fans because LSU won by 14.
I'm flaming them because they are so insecure that they have to convince themselves that AU ran up 430 yards on thejr scrubs, when it's clear that their first string played the overwhelming majority of the game, on both sides of the LOS.
Did they lose their intensity up by 3 TDs for a good part of the game? Sure, its human nature. Did Lester take his foot off the gas? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. Did they clearly have the superior team? Unquestionably. Was their lead ever in serious jeopardy in the 2nd half? Probably not.
So, why do so many of you feel it necessary to explain away AU's modest success on offense by falsely claiming that your best defensive players were cooling their heels on the sidelines for the entire second half while you were giving your walkons some garbage time in a blowout?
You're starting to sound like Arky fans. Stop it before you embarrass yourselves.
I'm flaming them because they are so insecure that they have to convince themselves that AU ran up 430 yards on thejr scrubs, when it's clear that their first string played the overwhelming majority of the game, on both sides of the LOS.
Did they lose their intensity up by 3 TDs for a good part of the game? Sure, its human nature. Did Lester take his foot off the gas? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. Did they clearly have the superior team? Unquestionably. Was their lead ever in serious jeopardy in the 2nd half? Probably not.
So, why do so many of you feel it necessary to explain away AU's modest success on offense by falsely claiming that your best defensive players were cooling their heels on the sidelines for the entire second half while you were giving your walkons some garbage time in a blowout?
You're starting to sound like Arky fans. Stop it before you embarrass yourselves.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 9:51 pm to FearlessFreep
I've heard ALOT of LSU fans say Les took his foot of the gas, which is probably true. I have NOT really heard anyone say that we took our starters out.
Honestly, LSU uses two deep personnel all game so I don't even think it counts to say we took starters out if we've got a bunch of two's in. Some of the two's play more than the starters. Most LSU fans know this.
This is not a flame but I think Once LSU got up 21, we treated this game, to a degree, like we did UAB and Kent. Get a W and try to stay healthy. Admittedly, we could have, nonetheless, played better in the second half. Combine that with the fact that Auburn didn't quit and you get 35-21 instead of 41-0.
Honestly, LSU uses two deep personnel all game so I don't even think it counts to say we took starters out if we've got a bunch of two's in. Some of the two's play more than the starters. Most LSU fans know this.
This is not a flame but I think Once LSU got up 21, we treated this game, to a degree, like we did UAB and Kent. Get a W and try to stay healthy. Admittedly, we could have, nonetheless, played better in the second half. Combine that with the fact that Auburn didn't quit and you get 35-21 instead of 41-0.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News