Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:46 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
that was a weak targeting call
You must be joking. That hit was as dirty as it gets.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:47 am to TheJoseyWales
Ha!
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:49 am to TheJoseyWales
Definite targeting call, even the Mizzou coaches in the booth said it was.
LINK
quote:
Missouri coach Gary Pinkel said some members of the Tigers' staff agreed with the call.
"Up top our coaches said that -- I think he had the crown of the head. That's what I was told," he said. "Our coaches upstairs saw it, and they agreed with it. So that's what it was."
LINK
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:50 am to TheJoseyWales
Moral loss. Excellent.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:52 am to Sabear
quote:
Hell it was one of if not the worst I've ever seen
No. The hit on David Greene was worse.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:52 am to TheJoseyWales
It was likely a fumble, it was definitely targeting (Ray was trying to put Sims out of the game) and it was certainly a pick. Doesn't matter , score wasn't even close.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:54 am to HailFreezusOver
Please, Old Miss don't reply. The last time we played you we beech slapped your arse at your house.... MIZ!
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:55 am to TheJoseyWales
Melt day 1
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:56 am to TheJoseyWales
I don't like targeting or horse collar rules. The hit was a penalty no doubt, I disagree with the ejection part. Chop block doesn't result in ejection and is as likely or more likely to result in serious injury.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:57 am to TheJoseyWales
The whistle blew on the fumble
The hit was illegal and your coach even said so
The out bounds call? Meh.....
You're a melty little bitch.
The hit was illegal and your coach even said so
The out bounds call? Meh.....
You're a melty little bitch.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:58 am to Rantavious
The targeting of JJ in 2010(?) was worse - and not called.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:58 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
Sorry but he led with his hands did not hit him with the crown of his helmet.
Well that's not true, but even if it were:
quote:
Targeting and Initiating Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player (Rule 9-1-4)
No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 2-27-14)
Note: Beginning in 2013, ejection from the game is a part of the penalty for violation of both Rule 9-1-3 and Rule 9-1-4.
Do you even football, bro?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:06 am to 14&Counting
I'm a melty bitch? I'm not the one kissing Bama's arse...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:06 am to TheJoseyWales
42-13
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:07 am to TheJoseyWales
Had all that stuff gone Mizzou's way
It would've still been close to the same outcome
It would've still been close to the same outcome
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:08 am to 82fumanchu
Yes you are..... But it was a game for 3 quarters and a little less ref help would have went a long way....
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:09 am to TheJoseyWales
Was never a game. Methodical beat down, Saban's M.O.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:10 am to TheJoseyWales
quote:
But it was a game for 3 quarters
...yeah not so much
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:10 am to nc14
quote:Knee injuries aren't nearly on the same level as brain injuries.
Chop block doesn't result in ejection and is as likely or more likely to result in serious injury.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News