Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/7/14 at 2:19 pm to tiggah1981
quote:
Fsu should have been 1...this committee bullshite is worse than the bcs.
did anyone really think that a small focus group would be better than a few computers with known factors and a couple hundred people voting from around the country?
Posted on 12/7/14 at 2:25 pm to TexasAg13
quote:
Agreed on Oregon, but the best option is to not prep for them at all. Now he doesn't even to need to worry about Baylor or TCU
Which is true. There's no question it's easier in principle to go through Ohio State and Oregon/FSU than Bayor/TCU and Oregon/FSU. But if we look at it as Title or Bust (and with Bama's success, I don't think 'It's an honor just to be invited' really cuts it) then the long-term value of being able to prep for your semi-final opponent and Oregon has a certain value.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 2:26 pm to TexasAg13
Committee meetings must be moved from Dallas.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 3:28 pm to nc14
59-0 leaves a LOT of butthurt.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 3:31 pm to TexasAg13
Dude. Baylor & TCU just happen to be the top teams in a conference that are probably a rung below the SEC East this year. They would have put up about as much of a fight against Bama as Missouri did, maybe less.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News