Started By
Message

Clemson lost 85 TDs and 8,428 Yards from last season

Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:00 pm
Posted by AU24
Toomers Corner
Member since Dec 2014
4523 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:00 pm
41 TDs Passing by Watson

26 Rushing TDs (17 by Gallman 9 by Watson)

18 Receiving TDs (11 by Williams 7 by Legget)

Thats 85 TDs






Heres the YARDS loss

8,428

4,593 passing yards by Watson

1133 rushing yards by Gallman

629 rushing yards by Watson

1361 receiving yards by Williams

736 receiving yards by Legget


They scored 19 points with all these guys vs Auburn last season.

This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 1:01 pm
Posted by SheaForHeisman
Oxford, MS
Member since Aug 2017
762 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:01 pm to
Anddddd they are still going to smack that arse
Posted by Rougarou13
Brookhaven MS
Member since Feb 2015
6839 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:03 pm to
You do realize that you can do this with just about every team. The ones that have a good offense anyway...so not us.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7500 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:04 pm to
That means nothing at all...Look, Auburn may be us, but this "stat" is useless..

Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:05 pm to
Yet they will still find a way to beat the Gus (LilBro) Bus and Company.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23117 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:06 pm to
Were those 18 receiving TDs not thrown by Watson? Those TDs don't count double
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:06 pm to
I get what you are saying but 2000 yards and 18tds overlap in that stat
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39993 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:06 pm to
Their D is supposed to be pretty dang good though.
Posted by ArabianKnight
Member since Jul 2010
2617 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:07 pm to
So these guys did more than the entire AU team last year?
Posted by Pinche Cabron
TN
Member since Nov 2015
3639 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:07 pm to
Trying to help yourself feel better? They looked awfully crisp Saturday
Posted by IStillMissDanny
S TX
Member since Aug 2016
2151 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:13 pm to
Someone is worried.
Posted by NotRight37
Nashville, TN
Member since Jul 2014
5843 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:16 pm to
Yes NYC is correct. Many passing yards and TDs are being doubled up by counting receiving yards and TDs of players no longer on the team. Plus Clemson played 15 games last year which skew these stats even more.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:17 pm to
It's not likely anyone will match Watson's effect on the team this year, but it's not a matter of "Oh, they're gone and there's nothing we can do to replace them." Clemson does have a new quarterback and new runners. The QB is just not going to be as good as Watson. No idea about the tailback replacements, though.
Posted by Commander Data
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2016
7289 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:19 pm to
Clemson will still field the better offense. Plus Pettway only bullies poor defenses so he won't be of much use to you.
Posted by remaster916
Alabama
Member since Oct 2012
12221 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:20 pm to
This will make it look even worse for Auburn when Clemson beats them.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30835 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

That means nothing at all...Look, Auburn may be us, but this "stat" is useless..


Well that's not true. Losing your best players is not a good thing especially this early in the season, not sure how you could argue otherwise.

Posted by CockCommander
Haha
Member since Feb 2014
2897 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:24 pm to
Prepare your anus
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38226 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:25 pm to
First of Auburn's four losses
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7500 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

quote:
That means nothing at all...Look, Auburn may be us, but this "stat" is useless..


Well that's not true. Losing your best players is not a good thing especially this early in the season, not sure how you could argue otherwise.


When you use the term "Lost", this implies that the numbers cannot be replaced and that is why the stat is useless...Our WR's corp is as good as last year. Refrow and Cain had big years including being major contributors to both Playoff games...Our TE gets replced by Junior Milan Richard who will fill that roll fine...Clemson may be deeper at Running back than last year. We were almost a one trick pony with Gallman and we have so much more quality depth at that position with a ton of experience...

QB position is the only intangible..

I'll gladly give up a few of your "Stats" in exchange for a reduction of turnovers....

Again, your stat is meaningless..

This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 1:35 pm
Posted by TigerFan4040
Member since Sep 2013
4386 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

AU24

Dumb thread is reallllyyyy dumb.

Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter