Started By
Message
re: Chip Kelly waiting to replace Sumlin? (Dan Wetzel)
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:38 pm to phil4bama
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:38 pm to phil4bama
quote:its almost like going 11-2 year in and year out will always put you in the playoff discussion and will give you the opportunity to make the playoffs the years you go 12-1 instead of 11-2
you will go 10-3 or 11-2 and lose most years t
0
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:39 pm to NFLSU
quote:
because a team doing this has never won the conference
Auburn actually had a running game, sweets.
Oregon rushed for 4000+ yards in each of Kelly's last 2 years.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:40 pm to Realistic Ag
Kelly would have to adjust a few things if he wanted to compete to win SEC titles. #1, the size of his linemen. I don't think you can win in our league with the type of player they recruited and built on the lines at Oregon.
However, he's a smart guy. He understands this. My guess is he's been sitting around thinking about these types of things (if he's considering college) every minute of every day since he left San Francisco.
However, he's a smart guy. He understands this. My guess is he's been sitting around thinking about these types of things (if he's considering college) every minute of every day since he left San Francisco.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:41 pm to Pinche Cabron
So a guy who hates dealing with boosters is going to go to a Texas school where those folks are everywhere. Seems completely believable.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:41 pm to SummerOfGeorge
and he has more access to guys like that now that he will be at a school in the state of texas. its hard to go into california and take big time names away from UCLA and USC. its hard to go into texas and take big time names away from UT, LSU, bama, OU, and A&M. he can have more success at doing so while at A&M
if anything, the only thing i worry is how he would respond to both recruiting in texas and dealing with some boosters since its pretty well known he hates both
if anything, the only thing i worry is how he would respond to both recruiting in texas and dealing with some boosters since its pretty well known he hates both
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:43 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
So a guy who hates dealing with boosters is going to go to a Texas school where those folks are everywhere. Seems completely believable.
Yea, and recruiting. He famously and openly hates recruiting. I'm not sure the hell you can be that way and be a head coach in the SEC in a state like Texas battling LSU, Alabama, re-energized Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio State, etc for kids.
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:45 pm to Section225
quote:
Chip Kelly just scores points and plays no defense ... like Sumlin.
The actual facts would surprise you
2009
Rush Defense - 42nd
Pass Defense - 44th
Total Defense - 35th
Scoring Defense - 51st
2010
Rush Defense - 27th
Pass Defense - 56th
Total Defense - 34th
Scoring Defense - 12th
2011
Rush Defense - 54th
Pass Defense - 88th
Total Defense - 67th
Scoring Defense - 52nd
2012
Rush Defense - 45th
Pass Defense - 56th
Total Defense - 44th
Scoring Defense - 25th
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:46 pm to Pinche Cabron
A&M will go all out for Chip and end up with Chad Morris
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:47 pm to ipodking
which wouldnt be bad at all
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Pretty shitty for playing in the PAC 12.
Whatever will get you excited though
Whatever will get you excited though
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:47 pm to Pinche Cabron
The Pac 10 was garbage when Chip Kelly was head coach... Pete Carroll left for the NFL and left USC in not the greatest of situations. I do believe Chip Kelly is a pretty good coach... but he isn't the second coming of Nick Saban or Dan Mullen.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Kelly's defenses would be similar to the current A&M defenses. They'd be athletic, have some players, but unless he hired a guy who could blend his scheme with the spread (Brent Venablesish), then they'd have issues with good, power rush offenses like they do now. Just like they did at Oregon.
They were front-runners. They ran up leads then unleashed their pass rushers and created turnovers. They were famously mauled at the lines in games in which their offense was slowed down and their defense was not very effective.
They were front-runners. They ran up leads then unleashed their pass rushers and created turnovers. They were famously mauled at the lines in games in which their offense was slowed down and their defense was not very effective.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:47 pm to ipodking
quote:
A&M will go all out for Chip and end up with Chad Morris
Not a bad backup plan.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:48 pm to yatesdog38
quote:
I do believe Chip Kelly is a pretty good coach... but he isn't the second coming of Nick Saban
Agree
quote:
Dan Mullen
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:49 pm to cardboardboxer
just a reminder that LSU went for tom herman and jimbo fisher and ended up with fricking yaw yaw
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:49 pm to NFLSU
quote:
Pretty shitty for playing in the PAC 12.
The #34 total defense and #12 scoring defense NATIONALLY is shitty? (That is their 2010 ratings...the season they held Auburn to 22 points in the title game)
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:52 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
And Chavis will be bringing in all of the stud recruits, right?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:53 pm to NFLSU
quote:
And Chavis will be bringing in all of the stud recruits, right?
No. Dave Aranda will after Kelly hires him away from LSU.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:53 pm to Pinche Cabron
Tennessee, imo. Immediately the best coach in the east.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 12:53 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Who would be above Kelly in the SEC other than Saban?
Malzahn for one.
So Kelly coached in a weaker conference than the SEC. His teams had trouble with teams that were physical and fast. #2? Nah.
Page 3 of 15
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News