Started By
Message
ChexMix's unbiased way too early Top 25
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:52 pm
1. Florida State
2. Auburn
3. Oklahoma
4. Michigan State
5. Alabama
6. South Carolina
7. Ohio State
8. Oregon
9. Baylor
10. Stanford
11. UCLA
12. Georgia
13. Wisconsin
14. LSU
15. Oklahoma State
16. Notre Dame
17. Texas A&M
18. Missouri
19. Texas Tech
20. Clemson
21. Kansas State
22. USC
23. Iowa
24. Nebraska
25. Arizona State
2. Auburn
3. Oklahoma
4. Michigan State
5. Alabama
6. South Carolina
7. Ohio State
8. Oregon
9. Baylor
10. Stanford
11. UCLA
12. Georgia
13. Wisconsin
14. LSU
15. Oklahoma State
16. Notre Dame
17. Texas A&M
18. Missouri
19. Texas Tech
20. Clemson
21. Kansas State
22. USC
23. Iowa
24. Nebraska
25. Arizona State
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:53 pm to ChexMix
No Ole Miss or MSU
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:53 pm to ChexMix
6 and 25 swap and we're good
haha jk, but seriously, 6 and 8 swap
haha jk, but seriously, 6 and 8 swap
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:54 pm to HamzooReb
quote:When you lose to Miss State you do not get ranked. Sorry, but thats the rules
HamzooReb
ETA: Neither Mississippi team has earned the right to be ranked yet
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:58 pm to olddawg26
quote:I could see that, but i value South Carolina's defense over Oregon's offense.
6 and 8 swap
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:58 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
6. South Carolina
They had us at 7 on espn. I don't think either are accurate.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:59 pm to ChexMix
quote:
South Carolina
If they go 11-2 again without winning the division/conference/huge bowl I swear they're going to do a 30 for 30 on the biggest blue balls ever given to a college football fan base.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:00 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:11 win seasons three consecutive years and finished last season ranked in the top 5. Yeah, 6th is reasonable
dawgfan24348
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:01 pm to ChexMix
quote:OMG WHAT?? THEY'RE SO LUCKY!!!
2. Auburn
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:01 pm to ChexMix
I don't have a serious problem starting out #12 but, no way Ohio Suck, Baylor or UCLA are anywhere near as solid as the Dawgs.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:02 pm to NIH
Don't get the love affair with OU. Though most all of their tough games are at home.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:04 pm to NIH
Bama ahead of Michigan State and I can objectively agree with that. All those teams above have proven they are better than Alabama after 5.
But the last time Alabam played Michigan State in 2011 the game wasn't even close. It would be no different this season even with a different QB and coordinator.
But the last time Alabam played Michigan State in 2011 the game wasn't even close. It would be no different this season even with a different QB and coordinator.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:05 pm to silverdawg
quote:
I don't have a serious problem starting out #12 but, no way Ohio Suck, Baylor or UCLA are anywhere near as solid as the Dawgs.
all 3 have very good returning starters at QB, don't see the big deal here
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:05 pm to reedus23
quote:And they return the majority of their starters on both sides of the ball. Plus they beat a very tough Alabama team, which carries weight in my book
Don't get the love affair with OU. Though most all of their tough games are at home.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:06 pm to ChexMix
Swap 12 and 18. AM is going to hurt more than what Missouri lost.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:07 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:This would have zero impact on the game if played this year.
But the last time Alabam played Michigan State in 2011 the game wasn't even close
quote:This would have an impact on the game if played this year.
different QB and coordinator.
Both teams have elite defenses and Michigan State earned their ranking by winning the Rose Bowl against a very good Stanford team
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:07 pm to ChexMix
quote:
3. Oklahoma
4. Michigan State
quote:
6. South Carolina
quote:
16. Notre Dame
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:11 pm to ChexMix
Michigan State wouldn't come close.
They don't have the depth. They might have the elite first string, but depth they do not.
They don't have the depth. They might have the elite first string, but depth they do not.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:11 pm to ChexMix
quote:
11. UCLA
can someone tell me why they keep ranking ucla high
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News