Started By
Message
re: check in if you are 2-0 in SEC play...but shouldn't be
Posted on 1/11/14 at 7:57 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 1/11/14 at 7:57 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
check in if you are 2-0 in SEC play...but shouldn't be
Obviously not the Ags. This was to be expected.
2
Posted on 1/11/14 at 8:13 pm to Projectpat
quote:Would it be fair to say that we pulled a Kennedy today? Am I using the term correctly?
Obviously not the Ags. This was to be expected.
Posted on 1/11/14 at 8:49 pm to ImperialPalace
quote:
Would it be fair to say that we pulled a Kennedy today? Am I using the term correctly?
Spot on.
Posted on 1/11/14 at 9:16 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 1/11/14 at 9:18 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
In 
Posted on 1/11/14 at 9:32 pm to Projectpat
Sure...a team that was 0-3 away from Reed was expected to overcome a 14 point deficit against a far longer team on the road WITHOUT Elston Turner.
This post was edited on 1/11/14 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 1/11/14 at 9:41 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Not only have they screwed up the A&M program, now they are trying to screw up the entire SEC.
NCAA is doing urine testing starting immediately.
NCAA is doing urine testing starting immediately.
Posted on 1/11/14 at 10:19 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
You'll probably go 3-0 on Wednesday
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News