Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:28 pm to Iron Lion
quote:
You are absolutely pathetic.
and i'm absolutely correct
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:29 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
He could have easily wrapped up the QB around his waist but consciously made a decision to go high with his helmet.
he consciously made a decision to let up and not hit him hard too. he could have leveled him. instead he bumped him
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:29 pm to bmy
Can you provide a clip that actually shows what happened?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:31 pm to bmy
First one is textbook targeting! He launched himself into the QB making helmet to helmet contact with the crown of his head. Learn the rules before bitching!
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:31 pm to bmy
Targeting isn't waved off because you also hit like a girl
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:31 pm to bmy
quote:
which of those hits were unsafe?
Regardless of if they are safe, both of them were textbook targeting. You can't hit QBs in throwing motion / after throw in neck / helmet area. Both plays the LSU player hit QB in neck / helmet area
A well coached team doesn't have these problems
quote:
he could have leveled him. instead he bumped him
That's like saying that you only stole a candy bar and not the whole box of candy bars from the store.
You still are stealing in both situations, regardless of how much you stole
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:32 pm to bmy
All 3 of those gifs were absolutely the correct call. You're fricking crazy.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:33 pm to bmy
Ed O needs to tell his stellar DC to stop all the damn bumping and attack on defense 'cause that defense got their arse kicked.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:33 pm to bmy
quote:Wrong again
so i guess this is targeting too?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:33 pm to bmy
those were both targeting fyi
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:34 pm to DawgsLife
if anything msu should have been called for holding on the play
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:34 pm to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
those were both targeting fyi
Not sure why LSU fans seem to think that the rules shouldn't apply to them
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:34 pm to bmy
The right calls. You might not agree they should be targeting, but if you want to argue that, argue with the NCAA. The refs were only following NCAA rules. That sort of helmet to helmet hit, especially when they're leading with the crown, is a legitimate targeting penalty. The only question here is should, not whether.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:35 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Regardless of if they are safe, both of them were textbook targeting. You can't hit QBs in throwing motion / after throw in neck / helmet area. Both plays the LSU player hit QB in neck / helmet area
Wrong. You can't forcibly hit him in the head or neck and it requires that the player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:36 pm to bmy
quote:
bumping another player is now being called "not that hard of a hit" and gets you ejected?
You cannot lead with the head and make contact to the facemask / neck / head area with the qb. Its been like 4 years, you should have been able to grasp this at this point.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:36 pm to 56lsu
quote:
if anything msu should have been called for holding on the play
I don't see a hold in either of those gifs.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:36 pm to bmy
quote:
Offensive pass interference
You can ask Bama about whether pick play PIs should be called.
You never seethem called, so for consistency it definitely feels like yougot screwed. According to the rule though, pick plays should be PIs
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:37 pm to bmy
L6U has the cryinest fanbase evever i don't where it comes from it's not like they been real good in football ever. 
:wah:
:wah:Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:37 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Wrong again
None of them were targeting. Good job.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News