Started By
Message
locked post

Cam Newton is getting railroaded

Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:36 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76539 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:36 pm
LINK

Just like this guy. Can't they see that they are both innocent?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76539 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

The Newtons' attorney, George Lawson, told WSB-TV of Atlanta on Thursday that he is "1 million percent" certain Cam Newton -- who signed with Auburn -- did not take any money. Lawson says if Cecil Newton discussed money, his son "knew nothing" about it.

Lawson told the Atlanta TV station that the Auburn quarterback has not taken any money in exchange for playing college football.

"No money has been offered to Cam Newton," Lawson told WSB-TV. "Cam Newton [hasn't] asked for any money."



hmmmmm. . .

Sounds like. . .
quote:


"I'm not worried about any of these allegations or anything like that, because I know what the truth is, like I said from day one," Bush said after a Saints practice. "Once the smoke clears, everybody's going to see we did nothing wrong."

Posted by michaeldwde
N.C.
Member since Nov 2010
3186 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by HawgAlude
Member since Jul 2008
5658 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:44 pm to
that is correct Cam Newton did not ask for nor receive money, but his father did. So, that makes him an ineligible player according to the SEC bylaws. What a retard.


Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76539 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:45 pm to
Cam's lawyer denied it. . .therefore it didn't happen.
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

michaeldwde

It sure didn't take you long to become a bad poster, did it? What is it now, two days?
Posted by cameronml
Member since Oct 2007
1909 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:50 pm to
So just because 2 people independent of each other deny allegations and 1 was proven guilty means the other is guilty? Interesting logic.
This post was edited on 11/18/10 at 9:51 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76539 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

So just because 2 people independent of each other deny allegations and 1 was proven guilty means the other is guilty?
Who said that?

quote:

Interesting logic.
I could always use none. . .but that seems to be your thing.
Posted by TLP4214
Member since Nov 2010
26 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:55 pm to
If the payoff don't fit...
You must acquit!

Was it 180k or 250k?

Depends... if the Uncle up in Michigan got his 70k off the top.
Posted by michaeldwde
N.C.
Member since Nov 2010
3186 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

cyde


Don't give up on me yet cyde... I've only seen that posted 300 times this week on every sports board on the net. Sorry If it annoys you that I called a snoozer a snoozer. I hate Reggie Bush because his and his schools cheating (probably) cost Auburn a National Title in 04'. I assure you that if Cameron Newton/Cecil Newton cost Auburn one in 11', I will hate them just as much, if not more.:)
Posted by SabanIsAGod
Jackson
Member since Oct 2009
3880 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:56 pm to
Posted by lsu1980
Member since Feb 2007
1991 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Depends... if the Uncle up in Michigan got his 70k off the top.


exactly
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Sorry If it annoys you that I called a snoozer a snoozer.

Sorry if it annoys you that I called a bad, uninspired, unoriginal post a bad, uninspired, unoriginal post.

Carry on.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 10:00 pm to
I don't understand how the Reggie Bush case is all that relevant to this one. Other than the Heisman implications, of course.
Posted by BrickTamland
BR, LA
Member since Jan 2009
1710 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 10:01 pm to
What the attorney claimed is that cam took no money from noone. Which is correct he took it from someone.
Posted by michaeldwde
N.C.
Member since Nov 2010
3186 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

bad, uninspired, unoriginal post


then I should be commended for keeping with the spirit of the op....
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

then I should be commended for keeping with the spirit of the op...

No, you should be lambasted for not seeking to raise the level of the discourse. You can only control your own actions.
This post was edited on 11/18/10 at 10:18 pm
Posted by bamafann36
alabama
Member since Nov 2010
32 posts
Posted on 11/18/10 at 10:18 pm to
cams a good kid
Posted by michaeldwde
N.C.
Member since Nov 2010
3186 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

No, you should be lambasted for not seeking to raise the level of the discourse. You can only control your own actions.


In effect it was required that I lower said level of discourse for what should be obvious reasons.
Posted by Pinchdatail
In the forests of the night
Member since Dec 2003
1205 posts
Posted on 11/19/10 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I don't understand how the Reggie Bush case is all that relevant to this one. Other than the Heisman implications, of course.


To start, two lying arrogant pricks who knew they were ineligible and would be be making millions in the NFL before anything came down.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter