Started By
Message

re: BCS Countdown Discussion Thread - 6 SEC Teams in Top 14

Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:12 pm to
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:12 pm to
Here is a legit computer (and then I will see where it has AU so I don't bias my opinion first )

quote:

A&H pride themselves in not only in the fact that their rankings are unaltered, but that their system has been applicable to the BCS throughout the transformations the ranking system has gone through during its now-12-year existence.

A&H start each season with a blank slate, and do not release rankings until after the fifth week of the season. This allows for the measurement of what the editors claim is a reflection of a schools’ “actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential.”

As far as strength of schedule, A&H takes into account both a given team’s opponents and the team’s opponents’ opponents, attempting to level the playing field if a team is the beneficiary of beating easy teams that in turn beat easy teams. Also this allows A&H to reward teams for beating good teams that are themselves beating good teams.

A&H also weighs strength of schedule according to conference strength, which is also measured by the conference’s opponents and opponents’ opponents.

Finally, A&H takes home and away results into account when calculating strength of schedule.

Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Isn't that the fricker bama claims half of their bogus titles from



National Champions- By Team

Team Year

Alabama 1925

Alabama 1926

Alabama 1961

Alabama 1979

Alabama 1992

Alabama 2009

Alabama 2011

Alabama 2012




Arkansas 1964

Michigan State 1965

Minnesota 1941

Notre Dame 1930

Notre Dame 1973

Southern Cal 1978


No. They do give Auburn 4. 1913,1957,1983,2010

LINK






Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

We don't have a Teddy Bridgewater for ESPN to suck up to. I'm just happy to be where we are right now, and to have ended any ridiculous talk about Louisville in the MNC-game.


F that, I want UCF in a BCS bowl

Plus you got a guy named STORM JOHNSON. Can't ESPN do something with that?
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:14 pm to
A&H has AU at #8.

frick the rest of them with computer AIDS viruses.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:14 pm to
When was the last time neither UTk, UGa or UF were in the Top 25?
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Louisville ... having a .000 average in the computers

That in itself is a pretty amazing accomplishment.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:15 pm to
Anderson and Hester

•Alabama, Florida St., and Oregon hold the top 3 spots and are separated by only .010
•None of the current top-10 teams have yet played each other
•Each of the top 5 conferences has a team in the top-10, with multiple teams from the SEC, Pac-12, ACC, and Big 12
•South Carolina's dramatic double-overtime win at Missouri vaults the Gamecocks—the top-ranked 2-loss team—from #24 to #12


The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways:
1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores. Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game. Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered.

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams. These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential.

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings. Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4).

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings. Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 8:16 pm
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28286 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:17 pm to
The computers have us at.......7, 8, 10, 6, 7, 5 and fricking 18th.

LINK
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:17 pm to
Think it is pretty obvious Anderson and Hester (A&H) is the gold standard here.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

fricking 18th.


That is the Billingsley bullshite that heavily factors in preseason rankings.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:18 pm to
Alabama, Stanford and Oklahoma are the only teams in the Top 10 of AH rankings that have beaten 2 top 25 teams.

Their 35th ranked SOS is the 5th best of the top 10 teams as well.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 8:19 pm
Posted by TheBuescherMan
Abu Dhabi
Member since May 2013
1231 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

F that, I want UCF in a BCS bowl



If we win the AAC, we'll be in one. The AAC has an atuo-bid for this year, then it goes away next year.
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
2394 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Great first post


Yeah, really LMAO at all the Aubbie posters in here! You guys really nailed it!
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:19 pm to
UCF won't get an auto bid if Fresno State or Northern Illinois finish ranked ahead of them and in the top 16.

So that's the really problem with UCF getting jobbed here. It actually does come down to the placement of the teams.

Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28286 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

TheBuescherMan


I am pulling for you guys to get to a BCS bowl.
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

The computers have us at.......7, 8, 10, 6, 7, 5 and fricking 18th. LINK


Highest and lowest rankings are thrown out.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26957 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Tiger n Miami AU83
BCS Countdown Discussion Thread - 6 SEC Teams in Top 14
quote:
Richard Billingsley


Isn't that the fricker bama claims half of their bogus titles from?



Don't know if it's the same Billingsley, but those would be 1992, 1979, 1965, 1961, and 1926. Nothing bogus about those. Tasty bait, though.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48931 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:22 pm to
Oh they bogus
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28286 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Highest and lowest rankings are thrown out.


I thought that, but I don't buy it. We should be a top 10 team then. The computers have us as the 7th best team in the nation. Both polls have us as the 11th. How the hell are we not in the top 10?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:24 pm to
Human polls are 2/3 of the score and yall aren't in the top 10 in either of those. You're only .0039 out of it. That'll change very soon.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 8:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter