Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:21 am to m45auburn
quote:
bad QBs
have you seen the UGA QB play? he's really good
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:22 am to GregAl
quote:
If Georgia wins, it will be because their QB completed passes when they were needed. So far, I haven't been overwhelmed by him.
Well shat, what does he have to do to impress you? Set antoher record this week?
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:23 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
What if i told you LSU went all the way to NY, just to play Syracuse.
all planned out. for fournette to have a huge game in the state where the heisman is selected.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:23 am to WorkinDawg
I did not see them play Vandy, but he looked exceptional versus South Carolina.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:24 am to monsterballads
Hey we like road trips so what.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:24 am to NorthGAVol
quote:
I'm on the fence with this one but I think Georgia pulls it out. That RB stable is sick. Can't blame anyone for betting on Alabama with their track record though
Exactly. We have an awful lot of young guys going into an extremely big game. Bama has been there before, many times. I give a slight edge to Alabama, but I am hoping for a win.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:27 am to VolFanInCzechRep
quote:
Yeah against a terrible South Carolina defense, we all saw how well he did when he played an average defense like Vanderbilt.
Tennessee doesn't have a QB that could complete that many passes in practice with no defense on the field. The odds of what Lambert did are slim he could do it. A receiver dropping a pass, Lambert throwing a pass away to avoid a sack, or just throwing the ball too high or low...ANYTHING could prevent a performance like that.
On the other hand, he got very little pressure from South carolina. Lambert is something in between an excellent QB and a bad QB. I think he is a solid QB. Period.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:30 am to higgs_boson
quote:
I did not see them play Vandy, but he looked exceptional versus South Carolina.
He started the game 0 for 7 and didn't look very good doing it against Vandy. Nerves. Whatever...who knows. However, since he started that game 0/7 he has gone something like 35/38. Pretty impressive. Let's hope the 24/25 QB shows up when we play Alabama.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:33 am to monroetiger13
quote:
Doesn't look like anyone needs to run on them.
UGA does. If you shut down their run game, the UVA transfer ain't putting the team on his back.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:37 am to monroetiger13
quote:
Too much emphasis on the past. When things change they change. Georgia is simply a better team and whoever starts at qb for Alabama will be starting his first game on the road. All this crap about Saban never loses two in a row was the same stuff I heard about him in revenge games. Georgia wants this one bad and they will get it. 31-20
All of your "analysis" is based on the kind of intangibles the media uses for hot takes. "Georgia wants it bad" "Emphasis on the past." Shows me you never played.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:39 am to jvilletiger25
quote:
UGA does. If you shut down their run game, the UVA transfer ain't putting the team on his back.
I tend to agree. I think we need to establish the run to help Lambert be effective. He did great against South Carolina, but we aren't playing against South Carolina. I think he is capable, but not great. Georgia has been and will continue to be run oriented and based. From what I understand, though, UGA is practicing on going uptempo. Should prove to be interesting. I am guessing we will practice it against Southern this Saturday in preparation for Alabama.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:44 am to monroetiger13
I somewhat have that feeling that UGA might slip here.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:53 am to jvilletiger25
quote:
UGA does. If you shut down their run game, the UVA transfer ain't putting the team on his back.
I agree that if you can stop out run game without loading the box then we're in trouble. However, that can be said for 95% of college football teams. If you have to sell out to stop our running game, Lambert is more than capable of making you pay in the passing game. He might not wow the crowd with 70 yard bombs, but he'll hit the intermediate routes and move the offense down the field.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 8:59 am to crispyUGA
I don't think everyone is convinced with Lambert because of the Vandy game. He faced a good defense with inferior talent and did so, so. Against USCe he looked like perfect Brett Farve against a very incompetent defense. I think he will do well against Bama. Bama has reputation of making mediocre qbs look like Joe Montana so I don't see it stopping next week. If Bama can control the game and make Richt play out of character they will win, but it will be hard to get them to do that.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:01 am to crispyUGA
luckily I think that is our major strong point this year and I think our DB play will show pretty large improvements (they are already better than the past two years IMO as a group).
FWIW, if I had to pick with a gun to my head I would probably go with Georgia, but am hoping the Tide can pull it out.
FWIW, if I had to pick with a gun to my head I would probably go with Georgia, but am hoping the Tide can pull it out.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:02 am to MontyFranklyn
quote:
I don't think everyone is convinced with Lambert because of the Vandy game. He faced a good defense with inferior talent and did so, so.
In his 2nd game starting here, first SEC game, and first road game. Also it's not like he looked like Jeremy Johnson, after a few rewatches he made correct reads on just about every throw. They were typically just a few inches off or flat out dropped (in the case of his first incompletion). And as mentioned, after a rough start he went like 11/14 the rest of the way so he rebounded nicely.
What I don't get is, why does the vandy stat line carry more weight/importance than SCs? People point to his record breaking day against SC but then naysayers say "oh, well what about vandy". What abotu it? He has clearly improved since then.
quote:
Against USCe he looked like perfect Brett Farve against a very incompetent defense.
skai moore is one of the league's better DBs and I believe was leading the SEC in INTs going into the game. But besides that, it's difficult to go 24/25 just fricking around on the practice field against air with no defense. To do it in a game, regardless of opponent, is incredible.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:09 am to WG_Dawg
quote:Well because SC's defense was a dumpster fire last year and still is this year. I'm just glad you all didn't choke against them. Vandy's on the other hand is solid, but with inferior talent. I was very impressed regardless.
What I don't get is, why does the vandy stat line carry more weight/importance than SCs? People point to his record breaking day against SC but then naysayers say "oh, well what about vandy". What abotu it? He has clearly improved since then.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:10 am to monroetiger13
If Alabama can't beat Ole Miss at home, they will not beat Georgia on the road.
Georgia is a much stronger team than Ole Miss.
Alabama had 5 turnovers against Ole Miss. This suggests they are a turnover prone team. Saban won't be able to correct that problem in 2 weeks.
Also, it's overdue for their luck to run out.
Georgia is a much stronger team than Ole Miss.
Alabama had 5 turnovers against Ole Miss. This suggests they are a turnover prone team. Saban won't be able to correct that problem in 2 weeks.
Also, it's overdue for their luck to run out.
Posted on 9/24/15 at 9:11 am to goodbuds
quote:
If Alabama can't beat Ole Miss at home, they will not beat Georgia on the road.
ole miss is pretty good..
quote:
Georgia is a much stronger team than Ole Miss.
we don't know that
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News