Started By
Message
re: Alabama's 2013 opponents were a combined 71-79, 47.33% win. percentage
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:04 am to Rabern57
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:04 am to Rabern57
quote:We tried to get San Jose State and Samford, but they were already playing an Alabama school.
Yall can still pick someone OOC that is actually good.
1
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:09 am to okietiger
So, doesn't this say even more about your program? What you're saying is Bama is not as good. It's their schedule.
Bama's not that great and only won 11 games because of an easy schedule...which included your tigers.
Funny how fans never talk about opponents' SOS when you beat them but when they beat you, they weren't that good.
I think you've got it backwards.
Bama's not that great and only won 11 games because of an easy schedule...which included your tigers.
Funny how fans never talk about opponents' SOS when you beat them but when they beat you, they weren't that good.
I think you've got it backwards.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:17 am to ksrph
Exactly, OP is dumb.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:28 am to okietiger
quote:
128. Georgia Southern – 51-95, 34.93%
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:35 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburns schedule wasnt really any more difficult than ours last year.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:37 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
It wouldn't be a Bama thread if you didn't post in it. Thanks buddy.
This post was edited on 6/4/14 at 8:08 am
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:40 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Auburns schedule wasnt really any more difficult than ours last year.
Auburn played uga and mizzou.
bammer played who? vandy or kentucky?
I know it's not a fair assessment since we played an extra opponant in the SEC title game. bammer is not used to playing in that game the last 10 years.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:41 am to okietiger
In basketball and baseball teams don't have the ability to avoid the best teams in the conference.
We saw what happened to bama in baseball when they had to face the best teams in the conference. They folded like a cheap tent from walmark. Same thing in basketball.
This 8 game schedule with permanent opponents is total BS and everyone knows it. The SEC needs to go to a 10 game conference schedule. Then we would find out if bama can finish better than they do in baseball and basketball.
We saw what happened to bama in baseball when they had to face the best teams in the conference. They folded like a cheap tent from walmark. Same thing in basketball.
This 8 game schedule with permanent opponents is total BS and everyone knows it. The SEC needs to go to a 10 game conference schedule. Then we would find out if bama can finish better than they do in baseball and basketball.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:45 am to BlackCloud
quote:
This 8 game schedule with permanent opponents is total BS and everyone knows it.
*WE* tried to go to a 9 game schedule. Most of the other coaches wussed out.
Don't blame us.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:49 am to okietiger
Upvoted.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:50 am to okietiger
quote:
1. Arkansas – 103-54, 65.61%
fricked
quote:
3. Tennessee – 101-54, 65.16%
fricked
quote:
5. Texas A&M – 100-55, 64.52%
Looks like the "sleeping giant" will hibernate at least one more season. I almost feel sorry for their fans.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 7:58 am to okietiger
Another stupid stat.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:12 am to BlackCloud
quote:
In basketball and baseball teams don't have the ability to avoid the best teams in the conference. We saw what happened to bama in baseball when they had to face the best teams in the conference. They folded like a cheap tent from walmark. Same thing in basketball.
Lol
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:37 am to iglass
quote:
This can be a bit misleading. For instance, compare and contrast Arkansas vs Alabama on this list. Alabama contributed to a lot of losses of their opponents, and Arkansas contributed to a lot of wins of their opponents. In other words, if the Hogs were a better team, OF COURSE their opponents cumulative record would look worse.
Exactly - Subtract out the bama game for bama's opponents to get the true number for bama's percentage. It is not bama's fault that Va Tech, Ole Miss, Arkansas, and Tennessee couldn't field a competitive team. Miss St and Kentucky are SEC doormats that are just living off other SEC teams bowl money. Colorado St, Ga St, and Chattanooga are jokes and bama is just doing what everybody else is doing, filling the stands for an easy victory.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:44 am to TT9
quote:
Exactly, OP is dumb.
And terminally obsessed.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:46 am to Rabern57
quote:
I don't think its coincidence that the rotation changes so Bama can keep playing they weaker schools. The coaches know how it works and even they complain about it.
You're a fricking moron.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:48 am to okietiger
quote:
1. Arkansas – 103-54, 65.61%
Playing Arkansas helped a lot.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:50 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:How many has Alabama played in?...and how many has Auburn played in?....you're an idiot.
. bammer is not used to playing in that game the last 10 years.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:53 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
I know it's not a fair assessment since we played an extra opponant in the SEC title game. bammer is not used to playing in that game the last 10 years.
You're an even bigger moron than Rabern.
Bama, LSU and Auburn have all played in 3 SEC Title games the last ten years. Arky had the other.
This post was edited on 6/4/14 at 8:59 am
Posted on 6/4/14 at 8:59 am to okietiger
In fairness they did play Bama so that is one loss that if it went the other way could have been higher. If you took 11 losses and moved them to the win column they would have been 82-68 and have a 54.66 winning percentage.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News