Started By
Message
re: A Redditor's Objective Mathematical SEC HC Ranking
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:52 am to WestCoastAg
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:52 am to WestCoastAg
0
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:54 am to beaver
quote:
Because he divided recruiting and gameday coaching
Well thats pointless
Posted on 3/6/14 at 1:09 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Good list. I don't see how you can't rank Sumlin over Les. Since Sumlin has been at A&M, he has the same amount of wins as Les, more top 5 finishes, more bowl wins, more wins against Alabama, and more wins against Ole Miss. Sumlin did this with a bunch of Big 12 recruits. Les had an armory of 4 and 5 stars coming off a National Championship Game appearance. It's obvious tDecline is real, and Les is a big part of it.
Posted on 3/6/14 at 1:48 pm to DWag215
No offense to others who can't recruit well, but using that as an excuse of how a coach's wins are cheapened is hilarious. You can have slightly lower gameday coaching if you recruit like a sonabitch. People think that because you get these lower star guys to beat a highly recruited team once in a while, then it is true that you are a better all around coach. I'd rather watch a 5 year span to showcase that fact. Recruiting is a major part of coaching and it is those teams who win championships. This has been proven for years. Assistant coaches play a big part too.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News