Started By
Message

247's updated 2016 College Football Team Talent Composite

Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:35 pm
Posted by dan765
Charleston
Member since Aug 2016
1170 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:35 pm
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:37 pm to
17 5*s
Posted by Aggie Fishfinder
Republic of Texas
Member since Feb 2012
4260 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:38 pm to





Posted by MullenBoys
In the minds of Ole Miss fans
Member since Apr 2014
13673 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by SwayzeBalla
Member since Dec 2011
19451 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:39 pm to
It would take an NFL roster for Butch to beat App State in regulation
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25875 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:39 pm to
We'd really be in business if our senior class didn't suck so bad.
Posted by MullenBoys
In the minds of Ole Miss fans
Member since Apr 2014
13673 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:41 pm to
I been following his stuff since someone posted it on a Msu board 5 or 6 years ago. He is the master.
Posted by TheSandman
Notasulga
Member since Nov 2010
19411 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:43 pm to
tfw 286 stars but no qb
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:44 pm to
What exactly is it? An adjustment of what a player is rated now?
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55241 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25875 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

What exactly is it? An adjustment of what a player is rated now?

I think it's just a larger team ranking using the players' HS rankings. Just trying to gauge general talent level.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43810 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:47 pm to
Ah ok that makes sense. Removing players who've transferred and the like.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25875 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:48 pm to
Yeah
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86461 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:49 pm to
From 2000-2015 OSU only has two 5*? That can't be right
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25875 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

From 2000-2015 OSU only has two 5*? That can't be right



Pretty sure it's just looking at the current roster. Don't know why it says 2000
Posted by dan765
Charleston
Member since Aug 2016
1170 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:51 pm to
It's a yearly snapshot going back to 2000
Posted by NotRight37
Nashville, TN
Member since Jul 2014
5843 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:00 pm to
Still not a great comparison but on average probably close to the truth. Upperclassmen should be ranked on performance on the college level not by their HS stars.
Posted by Sgt Deds
Member since Mar 2016
330 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:07 pm to
This is useless...but still kinda funny
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37612 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:31 pm to
SCAR at #23 ... proves we are not void of talent, proves that a couple of 4 stars have not lived-up to their potential.

It's key positions where we are still lacking.

A solid experienced QB, running back depth (we need a stud) and not enough depth in the secondary.
Posted by RebelTheBear
Saban's spare bedroom
Member since Aug 2016
5531 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:00 pm to
Incredible how some teams are absolutely loaded with talent, but still suck enough to barely make a bowl game.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter