Started By
Message

re: (23) 10-0 Missouri 64 vs 9-2 Illinois 65 FINAL

Posted on 2/1/14 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by Gcockboi
Rock Hill
Member since Oct 2012
7689 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 3:19 pm to
Porkerface has an obsession with Missouri
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 3:50 pm to
Final score:
Mizzou 75
at Arkansas 71

/thread.

Anchor this bitch.
Posted by geauxrebs
Member since Apr 2011
1509 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 3:58 pm to
Y'all really are real rivals.

Glad LSU can start playing A&M in football the last week instead of Arky.

Their athletic program is a wreck.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54621 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Mizzou Fan in Da ATX


In light of our effort to work toward better understanding, here is my only comment in a 16 page MU thread

quote:

Cheese Grits
re: (23) 10-0 Missouri 64 vs 9-2 Illinois 65 FINAL (Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:35 am to Mizzoufan26)

quote:

(23) 10-0 Missouri 64 vs 9-2 Illinois 65 FINAL

Not sure here, but if you lose, there is not a 0 in the loss side of the equation. Probably should be :

#23 10-1 Missouri 64 vs 10-2 Illinois 65 FINAL

Tough loss for the Tigers, especially now you are in the SEC, as you need to defend the conference from all that is B1G related. Nice win against the Hoosiers - in football - was a good start and beating Northwestern - in basketball - was expected. This game would have been the triple to cement the dominance. We never want the B1G to get bragging rights in anything, it is in the fine print of your SEC contract
.


If I was a big Mizzou troll as others say, seems like I would have posted more than once and would have been more based in an attack stance, instead I complimented the Mizzou wins and expected Mizzou to beat the B1G in the future. What may be happening is displacement association with certain folks who do troll and my posting on their threads means the displacement is passed on to me.

I am asking you personally where was my troll in this post, and where are other troll posts in this thread?
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:12 pm to
Cheese - you may well not have trolled in this thread and if you say you didn't I believe you completely, that said I'm not gonna scan 16 pages of a thing from a month ago that porker bumped just to, ironically, troll us.

You don't have to troll every thread in order to take part in it. We both have been guilty of it at times in the past. You know well that if you start coming up with imaginary program "tiers" based on your own criteria and proceed to say Mizzou is third tier, I've laid it out there for you that with stuff like that I will tune you out and say you're trolling. You're not doing that right at the moment though and thus I have no beef, and am hoping in the future that will be the case. Peace out.
Posted by Porker Face
Midnight
Member since Feb 2012
15320 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Mizzou is third tier


that's generous IMO
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

that's generous IMO


You know what else was generous?

letting us score 75 points on your court while only scoring 71 yourselves

thanks for your continued generosity.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54621 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Cheese - you may well not have trolled in this thread and if you say you didn't I believe you completely, that said I'm not gonna scan 16 pages of a thing from a month ago that porker bumped just to, ironically, troll us.


That is cool, just wanted make sure you did not see a troll in that post, as I sure did not.


quote:

You know well that if you start coming up with imaginary program "tiers" based on your own criteria and proceed to say Mizzou is third tier, I've laid it out there for you that with stuff like that I will tune you out and say you're trolling.


Good to know as I view that as trying to set some way to evaluate where programs fit. Perhaps the better way to think of it is how I view tiers which could be followed up by how you view tiers. That way even if we do not agree 100% with each other we can at least understand the thinking of how the other person constructs the view. That does not sound like trolling to me, does it to you?

If you were going to tier college basketball programs, how would you do it?
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Good to know as I view that as trying to set some way to evaluate where programs fit. Perhaps the better way to think of it is how I view tiers which could be followed up by how you view tiers. That way even if we do not agree 100% with each other we can at least understand the thinking of how the other person constructs the view. That does not sound like trolling to me, does it to you?

I'm more of a secular humanist myself
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 5:31 pm to
I was about to ask if someone started a women's basketball thread.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19232 posts
Posted on 2/1/14 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

You know what else was generous?


Porker's trousers.
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 16Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter