Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:48 pm to rockiee
quote:
agree but the coin flip guy wins this thread hands down.
Yep.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:48 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
8-4 with a loss to aTm sent you to the stats page for the last 5 games between LSU and aTm to do super duper research to prove me wrong
Actually, blowing your prediction up with your OWN POST is what caused me to do 2 seconds of research.
I hate to break it to you bro, but good trolls don't shite on their own attempt with a post less than a page later.
Just saying.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:49 pm to RB10
You've got a lot to learn
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:50 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
You realize he's so dumb/drunk/high that he'll take that as a compliment right?
Does it really matter? He already thinks he is the only one making sense in this thread
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:51 pm to southeasttiger113
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:52 pm to RB10
quote:
Posted by Hawgeye online on 1/19/16 at 2:59 pm to southeasttiger113
LSU will go 8-4
Losses to Bama, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and aTm
quote:
You post this shite, right after predicting aTm to beat LSU.
aTm, whom LSU has outrushed, by a WIDE margin, in each of the last 5 games.
244-89
384-84
324-75
219-134
288-155
I guess the LOS is only a strong predictor for the Arky-LSU game then.
It's a great look on you.
Keep on researching those stats for all of us.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:52 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
You've got a lot to learn
Im sure someone will teach me one day.
Not you, obviously. I prefer not to look like an idiot.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:57 pm to Opelousas Sostan
quote:This was what SummerOfGeorge interpreted as me calling football a "coin flip". I'm sorry that ya'll are complete idiots. The coin flip quote came directly after I said this. Nothing that I said was wrong and I said that BETTING ON AN SEC FOOTBALL GAME AND PREDICTING ITS OUTCOME is basically a coin flip, which it is. I never said that the actual football game is a "cpin flip" but ya'll keep running with it, ya'll are all so mad that there's no rational reason to believe that Arkansas is going to beat LSU next year
Vegas would not exist if there was. Like, do you seriously believe that past events in sports affect what happens in future games? If they did, everyone would make an absolute shite ton of money by betting on sports. There are entirely too many moving parts in sports to use last year as an argument of what's going to happen this year.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:58 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
It's a great look on you.
Keep on researching those stats for all of us.
You seem to have forgot some, let me help you:
quote:
(Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:11 pm to Hawgeye)
Because 5 = 2?
Ahh.....Arkansas math
And the butthurt response:
quote:
(Posted on 1/19/16 at 3:16 pm to RB10)
So you're saying Arkansas will lose to LSU at home now?
I see nothing changing with LSU. No QB, easy to prepare for. Soft on the Dline. Soft on the Oline. What's going to change? Does Arkansas run for 290 yards instead of 300? Does Fournette finally have a 100 yard game against Arkansas? Does the LSU line get tough in a single year period?
LSU is soft. Period. It starts with your head coach. Arkansas has man handled LSU in the trenches under Bert. It's not going to change.
It's not a fluke.
MASTER TROLL STATUS!!!!
Keep throwing that net out, oh wise one.
This post was edited on 1/19/16 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:02 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
I never said that the actual football game is a "cpin flip" but ya'll keep running with it, ya'll are all so mad that there's no rational reason to believe that Arkansas is going to beat LSU next year
Nah, I'm good at calling coin flips and I like our odds.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:04 pm to rockiee
quote:
Nah, I'm good at calling coin flips and I like our odds.
I correctly called a coin flip 28 times in a row last week. That's how I knew I wasn't going to win the lottery.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:05 pm to RB10
quote:
I correctly called a coin flip 28 times in a row last week
My high is 17, maybe Arkansas is screwed
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:07 pm to RB10
Oh look, it's the guy who tried to call me out on the gambler's fallacy even though he didn't know what it was then acted like a little butthurt bitch when I told him that it included the reverse
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:07 pm to rockiee
quote:
My high is 17, maybe Arkansas is screwed
I think Arky;s chances of winning are a bit better than 1 in 250,000,000. Approximately.
ETA: I meant to post that I called tails every time. Might have made more sense then.
This post was edited on 1/19/16 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:09 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
southeasttiger113
I'm not gonna argue with you anymore, other than to point out that if you go back and read the responses in this thread, 3 things are very clear.
1. You're the mad one, re-read your posts compared to ours
2. Everyone else is also on our side and agrees that you're being an idiot
3. You don't even know what you said 20 minutes prior and must be drunk/high/dumb as shite based on you not even recalling the points you made in previous posts. You argued that you didn't even say past results weren't real, even though I could show you a post 2 pages prior where you said that exact thing and it shut you down
Good day sir.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:10 pm to RB10
Yea LSU will most likely dominated the line of scrimmage in every game next year besides Bama. That one will be pretty evenly matched. Coach O is going to have at least 10 DL to rotate in and out of games next season, unlike 2015. The O-Line will be better even with the loss of Vadal Alexander and Jerald Hawkins. We return Pocic, Clapp, D-Gordon(probably), Maea Teuhema and Tony Weathersby. On the D-line we return Godcheaux, Herron, Gilmore, LaCoutre, all of our DE's and will bring in Rashard Robinson and Ed Alexander along with a few others. We will be stacked at the line of scrimmage for the next several years
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:11 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
h look, it's the guy who tried to call me out on the gambler's fallacy even though he didn't know what it was then acted like a little butthurt bitch when I told him that it included the reverse
Oh look, it's the idiot who still doesn't know what the gambler's fallacy is.
"When an individual erroneously believes that the onset of a certain random event is less likely to happen following an event or a series of events. This line of thinking is incorrect because past events do not change the probability that certain events will occur in the future."
"BREAKING DOWN 'Gambler's Fallacy'
For example, consider a series of 20 coin flips that have all landed with the "heads" side up. Under the gambler's fallacy, a person might predict that the next coin flip is more likely to land with the "tails" side up."
You said the poster predicting Arkansas winning because they have won 2 in a row is the Gambler's Fallacy. It's the exact opposite.
Go be a moron somewhere else.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:11 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
Oh look, it's the guy who tried to call me out on the gambler's fallacy even though he didn't know what it was then acted like a little butthurt bitch when I told him that it included the reverse
This is getting sad. Just stop.
Posted on 1/19/16 at 4:16 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:Not really, I'm actually perfectly fine
1. You're the mad one, re-read your posts compared to ours
quote:Ever heard of the term "circlejerk"? It's a legitimate internet phenomenon where a bunch of retards start agreeing with each other after one person starts. Everything that I was "wrong about" was taken completely out of context or people added things to my sentences that I never even said
2. Everyone else is also on our side and agrees that you're being an idiot
quote:Ok fig, we get it, you hate drugs and alcohol, but I was trolling TexAg's bitch arse in that post. I've never done a narcotic in my life nor have I even thought about posting here when I'm drinking
3. You don't even know what you said 20 minutes prior and must be drunk/high/dumb as shite based on you not even recalling the points you made in previous posts.
quote:No, I never said that they weren't real. I'm sorry that you're an idiot and interpreted it that way. I said that past events which are frozen in history and no longer dynamic aren't a good indicator of future success in comparison to things like physical talent of living, breathing, walking, thinking humans who are currently on a team. You can twist my words all you want, it doesn't make it true and it doesn't make your retarded arse right. You keep repeating things that I've clarified repeatedly and some of which I never even implied, are you that desperate to be right?
You argued that you didn't even say past results weren't real
Page 15 of 19
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News