Started By
Message
re: 2 things you were right and wrong about: wk 1
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:53 pm to cas4t
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:53 pm to cas4t
quote:
Stidham had worse stats than Etling vs Georgia Southern. He threw more TDs, but also an INT, and just as many completions as Etling on 7 more passes.
Etling looked better than Stidham, vs tougher competition.
Eting had 2 passes pretty much account for half of his yards and had no TD's.
One QB scored and had more yards the other not so much.
1
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:55 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Eting had 2 passes pretty much account for half of his yards and had no TD's.
One QB scored and had more yards the other not so much.
This is where we nitpick and take things away to make the worse performance look better.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:57 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
This is where we nitpick and take things away to make the worse performance look better.
like ignoring the fact that the shite qb played 12 games last year, and the badass qb hasn't played in two years. You, much like Etling, are a joke.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:58 pm to thunderbird1100
Let the barners slobber over JJ 2.0, it's all they have. UGA started a frosh QB off the bench and made stidham look like a mighty mights backup. Etling did really well and aub3rn fans will be salty because they're always jealous of LSU,bama, UGA.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:59 pm to AU_251
quote:
like ignoring the fact that the shite qb played 12 games last year, and the badass qb hasn't played in two years. You, much like Etling, are a joke.
Etling - 14/17, 171 yards, 82.4%, 10.1 YPA; 166.9 Passer rating vs. BYU
Stidham - 14/24, 185 yards, 58.3%, 7.7 YPA; 142.3 Passer rating vs. GA Southern
I'll just continue to post the facts for you to stare at. Etling missed a whopping 3 passes with 1 of those being a throw away and the other being a drop by his TE.
He quite literally only messed up 1 pass all game. It was a really good performance. Sorry you cant give credit where it's due.
This post was edited on 9/5/17 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:59 pm to AU_251
Stidham melts already. This is going to be a good season.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 3:59 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
This is where we nitpick and take things away to make the worse performance look better.
Okay so one scored and the other didnt. One had more yards as well.
Those are the things that matter, not QBR.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:00 pm to DonaldDuckworth
quote:
2. UGA is overrated - they are actually a very good football team
A little early to say we are good. I hope we are, but it was App St.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:01 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I'll just continue to post the facts for you to stare at. Etling missed a whopping 3 passes with 1 of those being a throw away and the other being a drop by his TE.
He quite literally only messed up 1 pass all game. It was a really good performance. Sorry you cant give credit where it's due.
So you can nit pick his bad stats but not his positive ones? I see
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:02 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Okay so one scored and the other didnt.
We had other players score just fine, Etling doesnt have to throw 5 TDs a game to be very effective like he was.
quote:
One had more yards as well.
A whopping 14 more yards passing on 7 more attempts, that's certainly something to write home about
quote:
Those are the things that matter, not QBR.
Yeah, no, I'll take the guy who was much more efficient, thanks.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:04 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
So you can nit pick his bad stats but not his positive ones? I see
I didn't nit pick anything. I posted the 100% facts.
You quite literally were taking away Etling's 2 longest plays to try and make Stidham look better and have a laundry list of excuses why Stidham didn't perform better than crappy ole Etling.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:04 pm to thunderbird1100
I'm sure you would take Etling over Stidham 
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:05 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
We had other players score just fine, Etling doesnt have to throw 5 TDs a game to be very effective like he was.
We arent comparing teams here....
quote:
Yeah, no, I'll take the guy who was much more efficient, thanks.
Ill take the one that actually scores
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:07 pm to AU_251
quote:
I'm sure you would take Etling over Stidham
I'm simply posting the facts, Etling played better than Stidham game 1. There's no denying that.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:07 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I didn't nit pick anything. I posted the 100% facts.
You did as you just chastised me for doing. it's pretty comical
quote:
You quite literally were taking away Etling's 2 longest plays
nit picking his good stats, just like you did with the bad on his.
quote:
make Stidham look better
never did this except for stat for stat
quote:
have a laundry list of excuses why Stidham didn't perform better than crappy ole Etlin
da fuq?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:08 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I'm simply posting the facts
as did I
quote:
Etling played better than Stidham game 1. There's no denying that.
a QB's main stats are yards and TD's, how did they compare?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:09 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Ill take the one that actually scores
QB A
20 for 40, 300 yards 2 TD, 1 INT
QB B
24 for 28, 280 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
You can have A, I'll take B.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:10 pm to thunderbird1100
B looks much better.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:10 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
a QB's main stats are yards and TD's, how did they compare?
You're really pulling out the stupid card today aren't you?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:11 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Those are the things that matter, not QBR.
Except QBR accounts for those things along with lots of other things that indicate good QB play besides just raw numbers. I'm not saying Stidham won't be the more effective passer, but I'm not sure he proved it this week.
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News