Started By
Message
re: 10 years from now who do you see having the series record lead in the new
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:33 pm to Carolina101
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:33 pm to Carolina101
Because were 20 years behind you on SEC expansion and were already even. We're recruiting at a higher level and getting them all enrolled(yes I've seen your 15 class) Spurrier won't be there 10 years.
It's alright to disagree, and I'd say bookmark it but I won't be here in 10 years either.
It's alright to disagree, and I'd say bookmark it but I won't be here in 10 years either.
2
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:37 pm to Nguyening
Lol your recruiting class is lower than sc's and you get a player kicked off the team every week
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:44 pm to Nguyening
quote:
Because were 20 years behind you on SEC expansion and were already even. We're recruiting at a higher level and getting them all enrolled(yes I've seen your 15 class) Spurrier won't be there 10 years.
Ugh. I should have listen to my longhorn friend when she said aTm fans are unbearable.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:44 pm to Dr_Tim_Whatley
No, our recruiting class is rated #2. We still are thought to lead for several 5/high 4* guys. We don't have any non qualifiers from last year boosting this years class either. This years recruiting class was such a minor part of my reasoning though.
Spurrier has 3 years left tops. Then what happens to USC? Average school, average facilities, below average history, below average funding.
10 years from now we'll be talking about whether the spurrier years should get an asterisk.
Spurrier has 3 years left tops. Then what happens to USC? Average school, average facilities, below average history, below average funding.
10 years from now we'll be talking about whether the spurrier years should get an asterisk.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:45 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
my longhorn friend
Get better friends.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:45 pm to Cockopotamus
Newsflash, it's like this with all Texans.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:46 pm to Dr_Tim_Whatley
Also USC had more kids not qualify from last years class than sumlin has had to kickoff since he got there.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:48 pm to Nguyening
quote:
Also USC had more kids not qualify from last years class than sumlin has had to kickoff since he got there.
lolwut
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:51 pm to Nguyening
quote:All of this was true for A&M just a few short years ago.
Average school, average facilities, below average history, below average funding.
quote:He'll be here through 2017 at least. Might stay longer.
Spurrier has 3 years left tops.
quote:Spurrier is laying the groundwork for us to continue building on what he has done here. USC is a destination school for coaches and players alike now.
10 years from now we'll be talking about whether the spurrier years should get an asterisk.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:54 pm to CockRocket
quote:
All of this was true for A&M just a few short years ago.
That's kind of his point...
A&M's turn around and SC's aren't comparable, thus when predicting future results...If it isn't 50/50 a series, it will most likely be in A&M's favor.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:56 pm to Nguyening
quote:
Also USC had more kids not qualify from last years class than sumlin has had to kickoff since he got there.
We've had 4 officially not qualify from the 2014 class. I'm pretty sure Sumlin has kicked off 4 players in one week, let alone his entire tenure
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:58 pm to Dr_Tim_Whatley
quote:
Lol your recruiting class is lower than sc's and you get a player kicked off the team every week
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:58 pm to Manzielathon
quote:Why again?
A&M's turn around and SC's aren't comparable, thus when predicting future results...If it isn't 50/50 a series, it will most likely be in A&M's favor.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 1:58 pm to CockRocket
I say 3 years, he says 2017.
This is where I quit trying reason.
This is where I quit trying reason.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:01 pm to Nguyening
You said 2017 tops. He said 2017 at least.
You probably shouldn't ever start, you're not very good at it
quote:
This is where I quit trying reason.
You probably shouldn't ever start, you're not very good at it
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:02 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:
Mizzou and A&M
haha,,,
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:07 pm to Nguyening
quote:Eh, you were wrong. Continue to deflect however you want though, I won't judge.
I say 3 years, he says 2017.
Also, you only addressed one point in my post.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:10 pm to CockRocket
I think Mizzou will have a series lead and we will either be even or somebody will have a one game lead in the series between A&M and USC even though A&M will undoubtedly have the more highly ranked recruiting classes.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:34 pm to Nguyening
quote:
Nguyening
I can see where some Longhorn fans, et al, might hate an entire fanbase because of you ... make them want to turn A&M into a constant stereotypical bum humping joke.
Thankfully, most A&M fans are not total fricking idiots ...
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:35 pm to CockRocket
Mizzou and A&M. Spurrier will be retired and A&M has been recruiting lights out.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News