Started By
Message
re: **** NCAAT Watch Party Thread*****
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:23 pm to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:23 pm to BluegrassBelle
only played UNC once and they won by like 2 points. their guard Berry went off in the game, think he had 30 plus.
thing that killed CLemson this year is teams shot much higher percentage at free throw line against CU than they do on average. that was a killer in all the close losses.
thing that killed CLemson this year is teams shot much higher percentage at free throw line against CU than they do on average. that was a killer in all the close losses.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:24 pm
1
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:23 pm to Tillman
So then that would be 0 times.
Good to hear. Call me when you can muster that.
Good to hear. Call me when you can muster that.
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:24 pm to vengeanceofrain
quote:You think? I think you can look at it a couple ways. Seton Hall wasn't in the tournament 2 weeks ago and NC has 8 losses this year which is a new record for a 1 seed. There's no easy route to advance in the NCAA tournament.
most brutal 8 seed of all time lol
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:24 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
o then that would be 0 times.
Good to hear. Call me when you can muster that.
why are you white knighting for SC? lol
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:25 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
quote:Nobody. Kentucky is a strong 2 seed based on resume IMO.
Who deserves a 2 seed over Kentucky then?
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:25 pm to Tillman
Why are you so salty about teams that made the tournament even when the NCAA Committee overinflated your conference's bids?
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:25 pm to Tillman
Wtf is up with all this "Duke should be a #1" talk?
They were #5 in ACC and lost 8 losses
There were so many better #2 seeds
They were #5 in ACC and lost 8 losses
There were so many better #2 seeds
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:26 pm to beaverfever
yeah we can beat Seton Hall I'm just tired of playing UNC in the 2nd round every time we make the dance
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:26 pm to BluegrassBelle
i don't care SC made it. they started bragging, i responded with valid argument that ACC is much better. nobody who is honest disagrees with this. both SC and Clemson are decent teams but not great.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm to Tillman
Cry more 
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm to Tillman
quote:
i don't care SC made it. they started bragging,
Yeah, they bragged that they made the NCAA Tournament in a conference that got half as many bids as yours.
quote:
i responded with valid argument that ACC is much better. nobody who is honest disagrees with this. both SC and Clemson are decent teams but not great.
South Carolina is a good team. Clemson isn't. Period.
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Wtf is up with all this "Duke should be a #1" talk?
They were #5 in ACC and lost 8 losses
There were so many better #2 seeds
It wasn't just that they didn't get a 1 seed, they barely got a 2 seed. It continues the notion that the committee doesn't give a shite about conference tournaments, which imo is crazy.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm to Tillman
So your making the whole sec sec argument
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:29 pm to BluegrassBelle
Clemson beat SC at SC, and beat Bama who beat SC twice. better?
who did CLemson lose to that SC is sure to have beat? Duke (twice), UNC, FSU (twice), Va Tech (twice), UVA, ND, Lville?
who did CLemson lose to that SC is sure to have beat? Duke (twice), UNC, FSU (twice), Va Tech (twice), UVA, ND, Lville?
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:31 pm to Tillman
And the stat that trumps all of your transitive property BS: South Carolina is an NCAA Tournament team while Clemson sits home.
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:31 pm to Tillman
quote:
don't care SC made it. they started bragging, i responded with valid argument that ACC is much better. nobody who is honest disagrees with this. both SC and Clemson are decent teams but not great.
You make an excuse for everything involving Clemson and have some reason of why they lost, but you tout the win against us and never mention that Thornwell didn't play in the game and only won by 2.......without Thornwell.
Do you know how bad we are without Thornwell?
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:31 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
nd the stat that trumps all of your transitive property BS: South Carolina is an NCAA Tournament team while Clemson sits home.
lol why are you stating something that I obviously understand. that doesn't refute my assertion that the ACC was tougher. Again, CLemson swept the SEC games 3-0 and two were on the road. in my view, CLemson was better on offense than SC this year, perhaps weaker on defense.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:32 pm to Tillman
And you've yet to come up with the team that deserved the #2 over Kentucky either.
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:33 pm to BluegrassBelle
it seems like you eager for the limelight on here. i don't care about kentucky one way or another, you said ACC teams are overrated when they've played tougher schedules than Kentucky and Kenucky is also often overseeded based on rep. kind of hypocritical
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:34 pm to vengeanceofrain
Can't lose to Missouri and Mississippi State while not beating any of the top opponents we played like Minnesota, Florida, Kentucky.
That is the difference in 5 or 6 seed and 8.
That is the difference in 5 or 6 seed and 8.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News