Started By
Message
re: ? for Bammers regarding "trick plays"
Posted on 1/15/10 at 7:05 pm to NBamaAlum
Posted on 1/15/10 at 7:05 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
think that is the right attitude to have. However, I don't think you will if you abandon the power formations. You will certainly get W's out of it, but a trip to atlanta will only be for the Chik-fil-a bowl.
Maybe not. Me personally. I think the zone read, ran properly, is a more effective run play then the I formation at the college level.
1
Posted on 1/15/10 at 7:05 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
Maybe not. Me personally. I think the zone read, ran properly, is a more effective run play then the I formation at the college level.
Hoping that Cam is the next Tebow?
Posted on 1/15/10 at 7:06 pm to CFBFAN1121
75% of the plays in Malzahn's offense play off of misdirection...which means they are "trick plays."
You won't have to worry about it much longer though, because Malzahn is about to be coaching somewhere else.
You won't have to worry about it much longer though, because Malzahn is about to be coaching somewhere else.
Posted on 1/15/10 at 9:05 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
75% of the plays in Malzahn's offense play off of misdirection...which means they are "trick plays."
Kind of play action, fake end arounds, pump faking the ball, etc?
This is so stupid. I guess you have line up in a two tight end set and run between the tackles three straight plays before punting to have a "REAL MAN'S OFFENSE". I guess Mike Shula was right all along...the Jumbo Package really is the best way to go.
<--AGAINThis post was edited on 1/15/10 at 9:08 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News